Punjab

Jalandhar

CC/155/2018

YOG RAJ s/o Kishori Lal - Complainant(s)

Versus

Kotak Mahindra Old Mutual Life Insurance Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Manoj Dhamija

01 Jul 2022

ORDER

Distt Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,
2nd Floor, Room No - 217
JALANDHAR
(PUNJAB)
 
Complaint Case No. CC/155/2018
( Date of Filing : 10 Apr 2018 )
 
1. YOG RAJ s/o Kishori Lal
R/o 142 urban Estate Phase-1
Jalandhar
Punjab
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Kotak Mahindra Old Mutual Life Insurance Ltd
6th floor, Peninsula Chambers, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel (W), Mumbai, through its Manager/Director/Chairman or any principal Officer
2. Kotak Life Insurance
Arora Prime Tower, GT Road, Jalandhar City, through its Manager or any principal Officer
3. Parveen Sethi
R/o HNO. Officer Enclave, Village Lohar Nangal, Behind Curo Mall, Opposite Church, Distt. Jalandhar Office at Ground Floor, 3950/3952, Laxmi Apartments, Makhdoompura, Behind Income Tax Office,
Jalandhar
Punjab
4. 4. Suraksha Sethi W/o Parveen Sethi
4. R/o HNO. Officer Enclave, Village Lohar Nangal, Behind Curo Mall, Opposite Church, Distt. Jalandhar Office at Ground Floor, 3950/3952, Laxmi Apartments, Makhdoompura, Behind Income Tax Office, Jala
Jalandhar
Punjab
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Harveen Bhardwaj PRESIDENT
  Jyotsna MEMBER
  Jaswant Singh Dhillon MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
Sh.Manoj Dhamija, Advocate Counsel for the Complainant.
 ......for the Complainant
 
Sh.Gautam Kumar, Advocate Counsel for OPs No.1 & 2.
Opposite Parties No.3 & 4 exparte.
 ......for the Opp. Party
Dated : 01 Jul 2022
Final Order / Judgement

CC/155/2018

 

Yog Raj Vs Kotak Mahindra Old Mutual & ors

 

Present:- Sh.Manoj Dhamija, Advocate Counsel for the Complainant.

Sh.Gautam Kumar, Advocate Counsel for OPs No.1 & 2.

Opposite Parties No.3 & 4 exparte.

 

Today, Statement of Sh.Manoj Dhamija, Advocate Counsel for the Complainant recorded that the matter has been settled with the Opposite Parties, so the complainant does not want to proceed further with the present complaint. As such, the present complaint may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn as compromised.

In view of the statement suffered by Ld. Counsel for the Complainant, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn after having been compromised. File be consigned to the record room.

 

Dated (Jaswant Singh Dhillon) (Jyotsna) (Dr.Harveen Bhardwaj)

1.7.2022 Member Member President

 

 
 
[ Harveen Bhardwaj]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Jyotsna]
MEMBER
 
 
[ Jaswant Singh Dhillon]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.