Delhi

StateCommission

A/1017/2014

BHUPENDER KUMAR - Complainant(s)

Versus

KOTAK MAHINDRA OLD MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

17 Nov 2014

ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHI
Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
 
First Appeal No. A/1017/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated 11/09/2014 in Case No. CC/212/2013 of District New Delhi)
 
1. BHUPENDER KUMAR
H.No.4305, GALI VERNA, VASTI NANDRAM, PAHARI DHEERAJ, DELHI-110006.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. KOTAK MAHINDRA OLD MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD.
AMBADEEP BUILDING, 7th FLOOR, BARAKHAMBA ROAD, DELHI.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION :DELHI

(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)

 

                                                                                                                 Date of Decision: 17.11.2014

                                    

First Appeal – 1017/2014

 

Sh. Bhupinder Kumar,

S/o Shri Ramesh Chand,

H.No. 4305, Gali Barna,

Basti Nandram, Pahari Dheeraj,

Delhi-110006.

 

………Appellant

Vs

Kotak Mahendra Old Mutual

Life Insurance Ltd.,

Ambadeep Building, 7th Level,

Barakhambha Road,

Delhi.

……..Respondent

 

 

CORAM

 

Jutice Veena Birbal, President

Salma Noor, Member

 

1.   Whether reporters of local newspaper be allowed to see the judgment? 

2.   To be referred to the reporter or not?

 

 

Salma Noor, Member

 

1.     Heard Shri Bhupender Kumar, Appellant/Complainant in person, whose complaint was dismissed by the District Forum, M-Block, Vikas Bhawan, New Delhi in default and for non-prosecution on 25.08.2014. 

2.      Submission of the appellant for his non-appearance before the District Forum on the date fixed is that he was blessed with a daughter on 20.7.2014 and there is no other family member in his family to take care of the child and mother.  Therefore, he had failed to appear before the District Forum and the case was dismissed in default.  Appellant has filed his own affidavit to support his submission. In the circumstances and interest of justice, appeal is allowed setting aside the dismissal orders dated 25.08.14 and the case is remanded back to the District Forum, M-Block, Vikas Bhawan, New Delhi with the directions that they will issue the notice to the opposite party and decide the case after hearing both the parties. The Appellant/Complainant is directed to appear before the District Forum, M-Block, Vikas Bhawan, New Delhi on 12.01.15.

5.   A copy of this order be sent to District Forum, M-Block, Vikas Bhawan, New Delhi for compliance.

 

                                

                                     

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.