Haryana

StateCommission

CC/687/2018

SUKHDEEP KAUR - Complainant(s)

Versus

KOTAK MAHINDRA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND OTHERS - Opp.Party(s)

SHAKTI MEHTA

09 Apr 2019

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

                                                 

                                                Consumer Complaint No.        687 of 2018

                                                Date of Institution:                    28.12.2018

                                                Date of Decision:                     09.04.2019

 

Sukhdeep Kaur wife of late Sh. Kawaljit Singh, resident of House No.184, Gali 27, New Vikas Colony, Karnal, Haryana-132001.

Complainant

 

Versus

 

1.      Kotak Mahindra Life Insurance Company Limited having its registered Office at 2nd Floor, Plot #C-12, G-Block, BKC, Bandra (E), Mumbai-400 051.

 

2.      Kotak Mahindra Life Insurance Company (Karnal-Branch1) having its Branch Office at SCO 250, Sector 12, Opposite Mini Secretariat, Karnal through its Branch Manager-132001.

Opposite Parties

 

 

 

 

 

CORAM:    Hon’ble Mr. Justice T.P.S. Mann, President.

                   Shri Diwan Singh Chauhan, Member.

                  

   

 

Present:     None for the complainant

 

                            

                            

O R D E R

 

 T.P.S. MANN, J. (ORAL)

 

On the last date of hearing, the Commission had passed the following order:-

“None has put in appearance for the complainant. The position was the same on the last date of hearing as well.

          Still in the interest of justice, adjourned to 09.04.2019.

It is, however made clear that in case there is no representation on behalf of the complainant on the adjourned date, the complaint shall be dismissed in default for want of prosecution.”

 

 

 

 

2.      The complaint has been taken up for consideration twice over but neither the complainant nor her counsel has put in appearance.

3.      In view of the above, the Commission is left with no other option but to dismiss the complaint in default for want of prosecution.

4.      Ordered accordingly.

 

 

Announced

09.04.2019

(Diwan Singh Chauhan)

Member

(T.P.S. Mann)

President

  U.K.

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.