Kerala

Kottayam

CC/90/2021

P K Jose - Complainant(s)

Versus

Kotak Mahindra Bank - Opp.Party(s)

Thomas Mathew

20 Sep 2021

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kottayam
Kottayam
 
Complaint Case No. CC/90/2021
( Date of Filing : 04 May 2021 )
 
1. P K Jose
Puthusseril House, Kudamaloor P O Kottaym. Pin. 686017
Kottayam
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Kotak Mahindra Bank
Theressa Plaza Railway Station road Kottaym. Pin.686002
Kottayam
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 20 Sep 2021
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOTTAYAM

Dated this the 20th day of September, 2021

 

Present:  Sri. Manulal V.S. President

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member

 

C C No. 90/2021 (filed on 04-05-2021)

 

Petitioner                                          :         P.K. Jose,

                                                                   S/o. late Kochudevasi,

                                                                   Puthusseril House,

                                                                   Kudamaloor P.O.

                                                                   Kottayam – 686017.

                                                                   (Adv. Thomas Mathew)

                                                                             Vs.

                            

Opposite Parties                               :         The Chief Manager,                                                                                    Kotak Mahindran Bank,

                                                                   Theressa Plaza,

                                                                   Railway Station Road,

                                                                   Kottayam – 686002.     

 

                                                          O  R  D  E  R

Sri. Manulal V.S. President

          Complainant represented.  Opposite party appeared through the agent.                         It is submitted by the counsel for the complainant that the matter is amicably settled among the parties.  A not pressed memo also filed by the counsel for the complainant.  Hence complaint is disposed as not pressed.

        Pronounced in the Open Commission on this the 20th day of September, 2021

Sri. Manulal V.S. President             Sd/-

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member                 Sd/-

                                                                                                                        By Order

 

                                                                                                                               Senior Superintendent

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.