Haryana

Karnal

CC/381/2022

M/s Shiv Traders - Complainant(s)

Versus

Kotak Mahindra Bank - Opp.Party(s)

Uday Gupta

23 Jul 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.381 of 2022

                                                          Date of instt.07.07.2022

                                                          Date of Decision:23.07.2024

 

M/s Shiv Traders, Novelty Road, Karnal through its proprietor Shri Dharam Pal.

 

          ...…Complainant.

                                        Versus

1. Kotak Mahindra Bank, Sector-12, Karnal, through its Manager/authorized person.
2. Kotak Mahindra Bank, 27BKC, C27, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai 400051 through its Director/authorzed person.
3. Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai Regional Office, Shahid Bhagat Singh Road, Kala Ghoda, Fort, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400001 (India) through its Regional Manager/authorized person.

 

                                                                        ....Opposite parties.

  Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                Mrs.Sarvjeet Kaur…………Member

 

                               

Present:   None for the Complainant.

                Shri Mohit Sachdeva, counsel for OPs No.1 &2.

                Shri Brijesh Sharma, counsel for the OP No.3.

                                                         

               Today the case is fixed for evidence of the complainant, subject to third last opportunities. No evidence is present. None has put in appearance on behalf of complainant. Case called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. It is already 04:00 PM. No further wait is justified.

                   A careful perusal of the file reveals that in the present complaint, the written version has been filed by the OP on 31.10.2022. The complainant has availed several effective opportunities for leading his evidence but the complainant has failed to conclude the same. It appears that the complainant is no more interested to pursue the present complaint. Further adjournment for the same purpose would not be justified as it would amount to wastage of precious time of this Commission and would cause harassment to the OPs.

                   Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is hereby dismissed. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Dated:23.07.2024.            

                     President,

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)       (Saravjeet Kaur) 

    Member                     Member