West Bengal

StateCommission

A/496/2017

Krishnaraj Pratap Thaker - Complainant(s)

Versus

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Anurag Bagaria, Niladri Banerjee

28 Jun 2018

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087
 
First Appeal No. A/496/2017
( Date of Filing : 28 Apr 2017 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/03/2017 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/153/2014 of District Kolkata-I(North))
 
1. Krishnaraj Pratap Thaker
47A, Satish Mukherjee Road, Kolkata - 700 026.
2. Pratap Thaker
47A, Satish Mukherjee Road, Kolkata - 700 026.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
Rash Behari Branch, 107A, Rash Behari Avenue, P.S.- Gariahat, Kolkata - 700 029.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SHYAMAL GUPTA PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. UTPAL KUMAR BHATTACHARYA MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:Mr. Anurag Bagaria, Niladri Banerjee, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Abir Das., Advocate
Dated : 28 Jun 2018
Final Order / Judgement

Sri Shyamal Gupta, Member

Present Appeal is directed against the order dated 29-03-2017, passed by the Ld. District Forum, Kolkata-I (North) in CC/153/2014, whereof the complaint case has been dismissed. 

The case of the Appellants, in short, is that, owing to absence of their Ld. Advocate on 14-03-2017, they were directed to show cause on 29-03-2017.  However, as they were totally in the dark about the said order, they could not take any step on the date fixed.  As a result, the complaint case was dismissed for default.  It is submitted by the Appellants that they were never reluctant to proceed with the case and barring very few occasions, they quite diligently pursued the complaint case.  Accordingly, the Appellants prayed for setting aside the impugned order.

We have heard both sides and gone through the documents on record.

The lapses, as occurred, do not appear to be intentional.  Given that the complaint case had almost reached its final stage when their Ld. Advocate for the Appellants remained conspicuous by his absence, we do feel that, gross injustice would be meted out to them if they are deprived of the due liberty to prove their case.

Accordingly, in the interest of natural justice, we are inclined to accord due privilege to the Appellants to prove their case.

The Appeal, thus, succeeds.

Hence,

O R D E R E D

The Appeal stands allowed on contest.  The impugned order is hereby set aside.  Parties to appear before the Ld. District Forum on 31-07-2018 for fresh adjudication of the case on merit.   

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SHYAMAL GUPTA]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. UTPAL KUMAR BHATTACHARYA]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.