NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/554/2009

H. ANANDA & ANR. - Complainant(s)

Versus

KOOTHUR MATHEW CHERAIN - Opp.Party(s)

MR. B. SUBRAHMANYA PRASAD

15 Jul 2009

ORDER

Date of Filing: 26 Feb 2009

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/554/2009
(Against the Order dated 12/08/2008 in Appeal No. 313/2008 of the State Commission Karnataka)
1. H. ANANDA & ANR.S/o.Late B.Naryana R/o. Ananda apartments, Kadri, Mangalore-575002, Karnataka ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. KOOTHUR MATHEW CHERAINS/o. Shri. K.V. Mathew, R/o. At. Kum Bhawanam Opp. Keb, Poser House Maroli. Kulshekar Post. Mangalore Karnataka ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. B.K. TAIMNI ,MEMBER
For the Appellant :MR. B. SUBRAHMANYA PRASAD
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 15 Jul 2009
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

          Limited notice was issued to the respondents for today regarding providing of ‘Lift’ in the building.  Regarding all other points, the order of the District Forum and the State Commission was affirmed.

          We had directed counsel for the petitioner to put on record the Grounds of Appeal filed before the State Commission to ascertain as to whether point regarding non-provision of Lift in the Agreement had been taken up by the petitioner in the Grounds of Appeal or not. 

          Counsel for the petitioner has filed Grounds of Appeal filed before the State Commission.  On perusal of the same, we find that the petitioner had not taken the point regarding non-provision of Lift in the Grounds of Appeal before the State Commission.  Before the State Commission, this point was not argued.

 


-3-

            Since this point had not been taken before the State Commission, the same cannot be permitted to be taken in the revision petitions before us.  Revision petitions are dismissed.



......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................B.K. TAIMNIMEMBER