Orissa

Malkangiri

31/2016

Santosh Ku. Hantal - Complainant(s)

Versus

Konark Redio House, - Opp.Party(s)

self

19 Jan 2019

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. 31/2016
( Date of Filing : 17 Dec 2016 )
 
1. Santosh Ku. Hantal
At.Block Colony Malkangiri,odisha.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Konark Redio House,
Near M.G. Road, Jeypore,Dist.Koraput,Odisha.
2. Managing Director, Samsung Elect.,India Ltd.
A-25, Ground Floor front tower, Mohan Co-Operative Industrial Estate
New Delhi
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Rajesh Choudury PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MS. Sabita Samantray MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 19 Jan 2019
Final Order / Judgement

Complainant is present. A/R for O.P.No.2 is present. Op.No.1 is absent. Complainant and A/R for O.P.No.2 jointly a filed an application dated 19.01.2019 wherein both the parties submitted that they have compromised their disputes out of Court as per terms mentioned therein. Heard from the parties present.

Perused the application filed by both parties and ascertained that both the parties i.e. Complainant and the Op. No. 2  has entered  and settled their disputes with certain terms and conditions. As per such application it is agreed by both parties that Op.No.2 will pay an amount Rs. 7650/- (Rupees Seven Thousand Six Hundred Fifty) only to the Complainant towards costs of the alleged mobile handset and in return, the Complainant will handover the alleged mobile handset with its accessories to the Op.No.2.

Further it is ascertained that the compromised petition dated 19.01.2019 duly signed by the Complainant and the A/R for the Op.No.2 that Op.No.2 will pay the aforesaid amount Rs.7,650/- (Rupees Seven Thousand Six Hundred Fifty) only with full and final satisfaction of the Complainant. Hence this order.

“ The Op.No.2 is herewith directed to pay an amount of Rs. 7,650/- (Rupees Seven Thousand Six Hundred Fifty) only to the Complainant towards full and final satisfaction against the alleged mobile handset within 45 days from the date of receipt of this order and the Complainant will handover the alleged mobile handset with its accessories to the Op.No.2 at the time of their compliance of the order. Since the Op.No.1 is absent and no steps by him, as such the present case will proceed against the Op.No.1 only.”

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Rajesh Choudury]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MS. Sabita Samantray]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.