West Bengal

StateCommission

FA/255/2009

Spice Jet Ltd. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Kollol Bhattacharyya - Opp.Party(s)

Ms. Pratima Mishra. Ashesh Kr. Bhattacharya

17 Feb 2012

ORDER


STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION , WEST BENGALBHAWANI BHAWAN (Gr. Floor), 31 Belvedere Road. Kolkata -700027
APPEAL NO. 255 of 2009
1. Spice Jet Ltd.319,Udhyog Vihar Phase-II,Gurgaon,122016, Haryana.West Bengal ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Kollol Bhattacharyya S/o-Sri Sreedam Bhattacharyya, 104,Desh Bandhu Road (East),Kolkata.West Bengal2. Bharat Travel Service2B, Tara Chand Dutta Street, KolkataWest Bengal ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :Mr. Karunashis Chakraborty. Rituparna Pal. Mr. Sambhu Mahata. , Advocate

Dated : 14 Jan 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI A. CHAKRABARTI, PRESIDENT.

 

7/14.01.2010.

 

Respondent No. 1 is present through Ld. Advocate Mr. Karunashis Chakraborty.  Mr. Madhusudan Jana, the Ld. Advocate makes a prayer on behalf of the Ld. Advocate appearing for the Appellant asking for adjournment as the Ld. Advocate conducting this case and located in Delhi is unable to reach this Court today.  We find from the order sheets that on 08.12.2009 none appeared for the Appellant.  Then again on 07.01.2010 as Appellant was absent a direction was given to show-cause as to why the appeal would not be dismissed for default and cost was imposed of Rs.200/-.  Today a prayer is being made for adjournment but we find that neither the cause has been shown as was directed nor cost has been paid.  Mr. Jana state that he is not conducting Advocate and he is only making prayer on being requested.  We are not appreciating the conduct of the Ld. Advocate on behalf of the Appellant as no cause has been shown nor the cost has been paid, the appeal is dismissed for default.


MRS. SILPI MAJUMDER, MemberHON'BLE JUSTICE ALOKE CHAKRABARTI, PRESIDENT ,