Uttar Pradesh

StateCommission

A/2541/2016

Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar University - Complainant(s)

Versus

Km. Priyanka Yadav - Opp.Party(s)

V P Sharma

18 Sep 2017

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UP
C-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010
 
First Appeal No. A/2541/2016
(Arisen out of Order Dated 01/03/2016 in Case No. C/116/2015 of District Firozabad)
 
1. Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar University
Agra
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Km. Priyanka Yadav
Firozabad
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AKHTAR HUSAIN KHAN PRESIDENT
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 18 Sep 2017
Final Order / Judgement

     STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

                                   UTTAR PRADESH, LUCKNOW

                                       APPEAL NO. 2541 OF 2016

              (Against judgment and order dated 01-03-2016 in Complaint

          Case No. 116 of 2015 of the District Consumer Forum, Firozabad )

Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar University

Agra

Through Registrar

                                                                                                    ...Appellant

                                                           Vs.

01.Kumari Priyanka Yadav

     D/o Shri Naresh Chandra Yadav

     R/o Shiv Ganga Market

     Pakka Talab, Shikohabad

     District Firozabad 

 

02.B. D. M. Girls Degree College

     City and Tehsil Shikohabad

     District Firozabad

     Through Principal

                                                                                              ...Respondents

 

BEFORE:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AKHTAR HUSAIN KHAN, PRESIDENT

For the Appellant                 :    Sri V. P.  Sharma, Advocate.

For the Respondent              :    Sri Naveen Kumar Tiwari, Advocate.

Dated :   18-09-2017

                                                  JUDGMENT

        MR. JUSTICE AKHTAR HUSAIN KHAN, PRESIDENT(ORAL)

                   Sri V P Sharma, learned Counsel for the appellant appeared.

                   Sri Naveen Kumar Tiwari, learned Counsel for the respondent appeared.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties on delay condonation application.

Learned Counsel for the appellant has contended that the impugned judgment and order passed by the District Consumer Forum is without jurisdiction and against law. As such the delay should be condoned and appeal should be heard on merit.

Learned Counsel for the appellant has further contended that the appellant has handed over marksheet to the respondent/complainant and the respondent/complainant has waived claim of compensation etc. before District Consumer Forum.

Learned Counsel for the respondent/complainant has accepted that the marksheet of respondent/complainant has been handed over to the

 

 

:2:

respondent/complainant and the complainant has waived claim of compensation etc.

In view of submission made by learned Counsel for the appellant now the appeal has become infructuous. As such delay condonation application alongwith appeal is disposed of as infructuous.

Rs.14,000/- deposited under Section-15 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 in this appeal shall be refunded to the appellant alongwith interest accrued.

 Let copy of this order be made available to the parties within 15 days positively as per rules.

 

( JUSTICE A H KHAN )

                                                                                                    PRESIDENT

           Pnt.

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AKHTAR HUSAIN KHAN]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.