Haryana

StateCommission

A/813/2015

AMBIKA ENTERPRISES - Complainant(s)

Versus

KIRAN BALA - Opp.Party(s)

ARVIND CHAUHAN

08 Feb 2016

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA.

 

                                                First Appeal No.                    813 of 2015

                                                Date of the Institution:24.09.2015

                                                Date of Decision:-        08.02.2016

 

 

M/s Ambika Enterprises, SCO No.42, Sector 11, Panchkula through its Prop. Smt. Urmil Kaushal w/o late Sh. Kiran Kaushal.

…..Appellant-Opposite Party No.1

 

Versus

 

 

1.      Kiran Bala wife of Sh. Amit Kumar, CBI Court, District Courts Complex, Panchkula.

Respondent-Complainant

 

2.      M/s Lenovo Service Centre, SCO No.66-67 (Top Floor), Sector 17A, Chandigarh through its Manager.

 

3.      Lenovo (India) Private Limited, Ferns Icon Level 2, Doddenkudni, Village Marathahalli Outer Ring Road, K.R. Pura Hobli, Bangalore – 560037 (Karnataka) through its Managing Director.

….. Respondents-Opposite Parties No.2 & 3

 

 

CORAM:    Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.

                   Mr. B.M. Bedi, Judicial Member.

                    Mr.Diwan Singh Chauhan, Member

                   

Present:-    Mr. Arvind Chauhan, Advocate for the appellant.

                   Ms. Kiran Bala, complainant in person

                   Mr. Ajay Singh, Store Executive on behalf of the respondents No.2 & 3

 

 

                                                O R D E R

 

NAWAB SINGH J, (ORAL)

 

          By filing the present appeal, Ambika Enterprises, Panchkula-opposite party No.1 has challenged the order dated August 13^th, 2015 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Panchkula (for short, ‘District Forum’) whereby complaint filed by Kiran Bala-complainant was allowed.  For ready reference, operative part of the order is reproduced as under:-

          “(i)     To replace the mobile phone with new one with same model with a warranty of one year to the complainant or to refund the amount of Rs.6200/- alongwith interest @ 9% from the date of purchase till realization.

          (ii)      To pay an amount of Rs.5000/- as compensation for mental agony, harassment.

          (iii)     To pay an amount of Rs.2,000/- as cost of litigation.”

2.      During the pendency of the appeal, complainant has stated that she has received the entire amount from the opposite parties awarded by the District Forum.  She would withdraw the execution application before the District Forum on the next date of hearing.

3.      In face of it, learned counsel for the appellant has stated that the present appeal be dismissed as withdrawn. 

4.      It is ordered accordingly.

5.      The statutory amount of Rs.6600/- deposited at the time of filing the appeal be refunded to the appellant against proper receipt and identification in accordance with rules, after the expiry of period of appeal/revision, if any.

 

Announced 08.02.2016

Diwan Singh Chauhan Member

B.M. Bedi Judicial Member

Nawab Singh President

U.K