Maharashtra

DCF, South Mumbai

EA/100/2007

V.G. subhramanayam - Complainant(s)

Versus

Kinetic motors Co. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Mohan Pille

07 Aug 2013

ORDER

 
Execution Application No. EA/100/2007
 
1. V.G. subhramanayam
Mumbai
mumbai
maharashtra
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Kinetic motors Co. Ltd.
Mumbai
mumbai
maharashtra
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. Satyashil M. Ratnakar PRESIDENT
 HON'ABLE MR. G.H. Rathod MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
दरखास्‍तदार व त्‍यांचे वकील श्री मोहन पिल्‍ले गैरहजर.
......for the Appellant
 
सामनेवाला 1 च्‍या वतीने वकील श्री आनंद गावंड हजर.
सामनेवाला 2 व 3 गैरहजर.
......for the Respondent
ORDER

Order Below Exhibit 1

 

Heard Shri. Anand Gawand, Ld.Advocate for the Opposite Party No.1 who placed on record the copy of the order of Hon’ble State Commission in First Appeal No.966/2007 decided on 12/03/2013. In the said appeal the order passed by this Forum in Complaint No.143/2006 (Old Complaint No.319/2003) is set aside against Opposite Party No.1 - Kinetic Motors Co. Ltd.  The Complainant is absent inspite of Notice. He failed to give verification & other details as required for execution under Sec.27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.  Hence, the execution proceeding against Kinetic Motors Co.Ltd. cannot be proceeded in view of Hon’ble State Commission above referred order and dismissed in default against Opposite Parties No.2 &3.

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. Satyashil M. Ratnakar]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'ABLE MR. G.H. Rathod]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.