Haryana

Karnal

17/2013

Rajinder Kumar S/o Sita Pal Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Khullar Motors., Green Auto., TVS Automobile - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. R.K. Mehta

20 Oct 2014

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. 17/2013
 
1. Rajinder Kumar S/o Sita Pal Singh
V. Padhana Teh Assandh Distt. Karnal
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Khullar Motors., Green Auto., TVS Automobile
Nadana Road, Taraori, Distt. Karnal., Arjun Gate Karnal., K-23, 1st Floor, Lajpat Nagar, part-II New Delhi
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Subhash Goyal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. Shashi Sharma MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.

 

                                                          Complaint No.17 of 2013

                                                               Date of instt.8.01.2013

                                                               Date of decision: 13.5.2015

 

Rajinder Kumar son of Shri Sita Pal Singh resident of village Padhana tehsil Nilokheri District Karnal.

                                                                   ………Complainant.

                   Versus

 

1.M/s Khullar Motors, Nadana Road, Taraori District Karnal through its owner Sukhwinder son of Kuldeep Singh  resident of Ward No.15, House No.  397/7,Model Town,  Taraori.

2. Green Auto. Arjun Gate  Karnal through its Proprietor.

3.TVS Automobile K-23, Ist Floor, Lajpat Nagar, Part II, New Delhi.

                                                           ……… Opposite Parties.

 

                   Complaint U/s 12 of the Consumer

                   Protection Act.

 

Before          Sh.Subhash Goyal……. President.

                   Smt.Shashi Sharma….Member.

                  

 

 Present        Sh.R.K.Mehta Advocate for the complainant.

                   Sh.P.K.Mandi Advocate for the OP No.2 and 3.

                   None for the OP No.1.

 

ORDER:

                       The learned counsel for the complainant has made a statement that he has received sale letter and form No.21 and 22 from the OPs and that’s why he doesnot want to prosecute the present complaint.

 

 2.              Therefore, in view of the statement made by the complainant, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance. 

Announced
dated:13.05.2015                                                                             

                                                              (Subhash Goyal)

                                                             President,

                                                         District Consumer Disputes

                                                          Redressal Forum, Karnal.

                   (Smt.Shashi Sharma)

                             Member.

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Subhash Goyal]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MS. Shashi Sharma]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.