Pinaki Sarkar filed a consumer case on 17 Nov 2022 against Khatra Sub Post Master in the Bankura Consumer Court. The case no is CC/37/2017 and the judgment uploaded on 18 Nov 2022.
IN THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION BANKURA
Consumer Complaint No. 37/2017
Date of Filing : 04.05.2017
Before:
1. Samiran Dutta Ld. President.
2. Rina Mukherjee Ld. Member.
3. Sudhakar Ghosh Ld. Member.
For the Complainant: Self
For the O.P. Govt. Pleader, Bankura
Complainant
Pinaki Sarkar, S/o Shyamal Kr. Sarkar, at High School Road, PO Khatra, Dist Bankura
Opposite Party
Khatra Sub Post Master, P.O.Khatra, Dist. Bankura, PIN 722 140
FINAL ORDER / JUDGEMENT
ORDER NO.33
Dt. 17-11-2022
The case is fixed for argument.
The complainant is personally present by filing hazira.
No step is taken by the O.P.
It appears from the record that the case is fixed for argument since 20-08-2018. Though the O.P./Post Office authority filed W.V. on 16-02-2018 but perhaps they are not interested to contest the case.
The Commission decides to dispose of the case hereunder.
Contd……p/2
Page: 2
The complainant’s case is that M/s TSR Darashaw Limited from Mumbai sent him three Share Certificates by Speed Post vide Postal consignment no.EMI 83263994IN and article was booked on 22-10-2016 from BNPLSP Hub AGRIPADA , Mumbai. Said article was received by Khatra Sub Post Office, Bankura on 28-10-2016 but it was not delivered to the complainant. The complainant has therefore filed this case against the O.P. praying for Rs.55,400/- as compensation together with Rs.15,000/- as litigation cost.
Initially the O.P./Postal authority filed W.V. denying all the material allegations made in the complaint but contending inter alia that the complainant is not at all a consumer within the definition of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and that the article in question was misplaced and after vigorous search the same was found out on 10-06-2017 and immediately thereafter it was sent to the addressee i.e. complainant but he refused to take delivery of the same. The complainant for the second time also refused to take delivery of the article on 15-07-2017. Finally the Speed Post article was returned to its booking office on 28-07-2017 through Bag No.EBW0007377512 and the said article was ultimately delivered by Jacob Circle S.O. to TSR Darashaw Limited on 03-08-2017. The Post Office authority has therefore pleaded no deficiency of service on their part and hence they have prayed for dismissal of the complaint.
In the mean time the complainant approached said share certificate issuing authority i.e. M/s TSR Darashaw Limited regarding return delivery of Speed Post articles as claimed by the Postal Authority but by letter dated: 21-09-2017 said share certificate issuing authority has intimated to the complainant that the Speed Post articles were not at all received by them. The complainant has produced the copy of the said letter at the time of hearing which be kept with the record as part of evidence.
On perusal of the materials on record the Commission finds that the O.P./Postal Authority is liable and accountable to the sender of the Speed Post article i.e. share certificate issuing authority M/s TSR Darashaw Limited but they have no liability under law to the addressee/complainant. But the fact remains that the Speed Post articles i.e. three share certificates as mentioned in the petition of complaint the description of which is given below was dispatched to the complainant through Speed Post but unfortunately it was not received by the complainant for which the complainant has suffered pecuniary loss.
Sl No | Certificate No. | Distinctive Number From | Distinctive
To | Name of Company | Number Of Securities | Present Value |
1 | 06182279 | 229521211 | 229521260 | Tata Steel | 50 | Rs.462 x 120 nos.
|
2 | R04707176 | 326030257 | 326030306 | Tata Steel | 50 | |
3 | R04707177 | 326030307 | 326030326 | Tata Steel | 20 | |
|
|
|
| Total
| 120 Nos. | Rs.55,440/- |
Contd…………p/3
Page 3
Without going into the controversy as to the fate of those Speed Post article whether it is misplaced, lost or delivered it is in the interest of justice that an order should be passed upon M/s TSR Darashaw Limited to reissue fresh share certificates in favour of the complainant as mentioned hereinabove by Speed Post / Courier Service as the case may be though said share certificate issuing authority is not a party to this case.
Hence it is ordered……..
That the complaint case no. C.C. 37/2017 is disposed of by directing M/s TSR Darashaw Limited, 6-10, Haji Moosa Patrawala Ind. Estate, 20 Dr. E. Moses Road, Near Famous Studio , Mahalaxmi (W), Mumbai 400 011 to re-issue fresh share certificates as mentioned above in favour of the complainant by Speed Post/Courier Service as the case may be within a reasonable time.
Let a copy of this order be given to the parties including M/s TSR Darashaw Limited free of cost. The complainant is directed to send the copy of this order to M/s TSR Darashaw Limited for taking necessary action.
__________________ ________________ ________________
HON’BLE PRESIDENT HON’BLE MEMBER HON’BLE MEMBER
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.