Kerala

StateCommission

A/10/24

KSEB - Complainant(s)

Versus

Khadeeja - Opp.Party(s)

B.Sakthidaran Nair

28 Jan 2010

ORDER

Daily Order

First Appeal No. A/10/24
(Arisen out of order dated 23/09/2009 in Case No. CC 138/08 of District Kasaragod)
1. KSEB The Secretary, KSEB, Vydyuthi Bhavan, Pattom
Kerala
2. The Asst. Engineer Electrical Section, KSEB, Kumbala, Kasargod
Kerala
....Appellant
1.   Khadeeja Soorambail Edanad, Edanad.P.O, Kasagod
Kerala

....Respondent

 
HONORABLE JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU , PRESIDENT

PRESENT:
None for the Appellant
None for the Respondent
*JUDGEMENT/ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

FIRST APPEAL 24/2010

JUDGMENT DATED:28.1.2010

PRESENT

JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU    : PRESIDENT

 

1. The Secretary, K.S.E.B.,                         : APPELLANTS

    Vidyudhi Bhavan, Pattom,

     Thiruvananthpauram.

 

2. The Assistnat Engineer,

     Electrical Section, KSEB.,

     Kumbala,  Kasargod Taluk.

(By Adv.B.Sakthidharan Nair)

 

                  vs.

Khadeeja, W/o Hameed Ali,                     : RESPONDENT

Residing at Soorambail Edanad,

Edanad.P.O., Kasargod Taluk.

 

JUDGMENT

 

JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU    : PRESIDENT

 

 

            The appellants are the opposite parties in CC138/08 in the file of CDRF, Kasargod.  The appellants are under orders to provide electric connection to the pump house of the complainant on or before 31.12.2009 failing which  to pay a compensation of Rs.25000/-

          2.The case of the complainant is that she applied for electric connection to the pump house and remitted necessary charges on 20.4.09 and 12.5.09  and dug a bore well for irrigation purposes.  She could not use the same as the connection has not been provided so far. 

3. The case of the opposite parties is that her priority has not reached.

4.     The evidence adduced consisted of Ext.A1 to A5.

5.The order of the Forum is dated 23.9.09.  We find that the opposite parties/appellants have not produced any authority to substantiate their contention that the persons who applied for electric connection in the above category before the complainant has not been provided  with the electric connection.  In the circumstances we find that there is no scope for admitting the appeal.

5.     The appeal is dismissed in limine.

The office is directed to forward the copy of this order to the Forum urgently.

 

JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU  : PRESIDENT

 

 

ps

 

Pronounced
Dated the 28 January 2010
[HONORABLE JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]
PRESIDENT


Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.