KSEB filed a consumer case on 28 Jan 2010 against Khadeeja in the StateCommission Consumer Court. The case no is A/10/24 and the judgment uploaded on 30 Nov -0001.
First Appeal No. A/10/24 (Arisen out of order dated 23/09/2009 in Case No. CC 138/08 of District Kasaragod) | ||||||||||||||
1. KSEB The Secretary, KSEB, Vydyuthi Bhavan, Pattom Kerala 2. The Asst. Engineer Electrical Section, KSEB, Kumbala, Kasargod Kerala ....Appellant 1. Khadeeja Soorambail Edanad, Edanad.P.O, Kasagod Kerala ....Respondent | ||||||||||||||
*JUDGEMENT/ORDER KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM FIRST APPEAL 24/2010 JUDGMENT DATED:28.1.2010PRESENT JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU : PRESIDENT 1. The Secretary, K.S.E.B., : APPELLANTS Vidyudhi Bhavan, Pattom, Thiruvananthpauram. 2. The Assistnat Engineer, Electrical Section, KSEB., Kumbala, Kasargod Taluk. (By Adv.B.Sakthidharan Nair) vs. Khadeeja, W/o Hameed Ali, : RESPONDENT Residing at Soorambail Edanad, Edanad.P.O., Kasargod Taluk. JUDGMENT JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU : PRESIDENT The appellants are the opposite parties in CC138/08 in the file of CDRF, Kasargod. The appellants are under orders to provide electric connection to the pump house of the complainant on or before 31.12.2009 failing which to pay a compensation of Rs.25000/- 2.The case of the complainant is that she applied for electric connection to the pump house and remitted necessary charges on 20.4.09 and 12.5.09 and dug a bore well for irrigation purposes. She could not use the same as the connection has not been provided so far. 3. The case of the opposite parties is that her priority has not reached. 4. The evidence adduced consisted of Ext.A1 to A5. 5.The order of the Forum is dated 23.9.09. We find that the opposite parties/appellants have not produced any authority to substantiate their contention that the persons who applied for electric connection in the above category before the complainant has not been provided with the electric connection. In the circumstances we find that there is no scope for admitting the appeal. 5. The appeal is dismissed in limine. The office is directed to forward the copy of this order to the Forum urgently. JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU : PRESIDENT ps
Pronounced Dated the 28 January 2010
|
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.