IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ALAPPUZHA
Monday the 28th day of July, 2008
Filed on 29.09.2004
Present
- Sri. Jimmy Korah (President)
- Sri. K. Anirudhan (Member)
- Smt. Shajitha Beevi (Member)
in
C.C.No.223/2004
between
Complainant:- Opposite Party:-
Sri.Aravindakshan @ Kerala Water Authority
Aravind Krishnan Represented by the Assistant
Valayil House Executive Engineer
Ambalappuzha P.O., Alappuzha Alappuzha
(By Adv. T.J. Thulasikrishnan) (By Adv. T. Saji)
O R D E R |
SMT. N. SHAJITHA BEEVI (MEMBER) | Sri. Aravindakshan has filed this complaint before the Forum alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties – Kerala Water Authority, Alappuzha. The brief statement of the contentions are as follows:- The complainant is a consumer of opposite party having Consumer No.AMB/315/D. He remitted Rs.1016/- on 17.2.2003 as domestic water charge up to February, 2003 and on the same day he given an application before the opposite party stating that he intending to start a Restaurant attached to his house and requested to change the domestic water connection to non domestic. But without getting any intimation from the opposite party. The complainant received a bill dated 17.7.2003 from the opposite party stating that an amount of Rs.7,773/- is to be remitted within 7 days. Complainant contacted the opposite party and challenged the illegal act of the opposite party. Thereafter another exorbitant bill dated 13.2.2004 issued by the opposite party for an amount of Rs.22,401/-. Hence this complaint. 2. Notice was issued to the opposite party. The opposite party had filed vakalath and filed version with untenable contentions. In the version of the opposite party stating that complainant is legally bound to remit the bill amount. 3. Considering the contentions of the complainant and opposite party, this Forum has raised the following issues:- (1) Whether there is any deficiency in service on the part of the opposite (2) Compensation and costs. 4. Issue 4. Issues (1) and (2):- On the part of the complainant he has examined as PW1 and filed proof affidavit and produced documents – Exts.A1 to A9 – marked and the complainant was cross examined by the opposite party. Ext.A1 is the receipt for Rs.1016/-, Ext.A2 is the copy of the letter dated 17.2.2003, Ext.A3 is the consumer bill dated 31.7.2003 for Rs.7553/-, Ext.A4 is the notice dated 30.9.2003, Ext.A5 is the copy of the letter dated 22.10.2003, Ext.A6 is the postal receipt, Ext.A7 is the consumer bill dated 28.2.2004 for Rs.22,507/-, Ext.A8 is the copy of the letter dated 13.4.2004 and Ext.A9 is the postal receipt. On the s 5. On the side of the opposite party, they have filed proof affidavit and the executive engineer was examined as RW1 and documents – Exts.B1 to B3 – marked. Ext.B1 is the true copy of the statement (2 sheets), Ext.B2 is the true copy of the meter reader’s hand book and Ext.B3 is the consumer ledger of water authority. e party 6. In the proof affidavit, the complainant has stated that before the issuance of the said bill dated 17.7.2003 complainant remitted full amount up to 17.2.2003. But in this connection it is to be noted that the opposite party has not filed any document or any statement before this Forum denying the statement of the complainant. So there is no reason to disbelieve the complainant and his statement and documents. The present bill for arrear is without any previous notice regarding the arrears and details of the consumption of water and other details will not stand in any way. So the action of the opposite party is highly unfair illegal arbitrary and it will come within the purview of deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party, complainant is entitled to get compensation and costs also. So the issues are found in favour of the complainant . In the result, we are of the strong view that the complaint is to be allowed. Hence we hereby direct the opposite party to withdraw the exorbitant bill dated 13.02.2004 for an amount of Rs.22,401/- issued to the complainant immediately. Since the complainant is not liable to remit any amount to the opposite party by way of water charges. We further direct the opposite party to pay a sum of Rs.1000/- (Rupees one thousand only) as compensation to the complainant for his mental agony, inconvenience and deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party together with a cost of Rs.500/- (Rupees five hundred only) for this proceedings. We further direct the opposite party to comply with this order within one month from the receipt of this order. Complaint allowed. | | | | |
| | | | | |
Pronounced in open Forum on this the 28th day of July, 2008.
Sd/- SMT. N. SHAJITHA BEEVI:
Sd/- SRI. JIMMY KORAH:
Sd/- SRI. K. ANIRUDHAN:
Appendix:-
Evidence of the dence of the complainant:-
PW1 - Aravindakshan (Witness)
Ext.A1 - Receipt for Rs.1016/-
Ext.A2 - Copy of the letter dated 17.2.2003
Ext.A3 - Consumer bill dated 31.7.2003 for Rs.7553/-
Ext.A4 - Notice dated 30.9.2003
Ext.A5 - Copy of the letter dated 22.10.2003
Ext.A6 - Postal receipt
Ext.A7 - Consumer bill dated 28.2.2004 for Rs.22,507/-
Ext.A8 - Copy of the letter dated 13.4.2004
Ext.A9 - Postal receipt
Evidence of the opposite party:-
RW1 - Devaraj (Witness)
Ext.B1 - True Copy of the statement ( 2 sheets)
Ext.B2 - True copy of the meter reader’s hand book
Ext.B3 - Consumer ledger of water authority
// True Copy //
By Order
Senior Superintendent
To
Complainant/Opposite party/S.F.
Typed by:-pr/-
Compared by:-