Kerala

Kottayam

CC/79/2016

Mathew Philip - Complainant(s)

Versus

Kerala Water Authority - Opp.Party(s)

K.T. Jayaprakash

28 Apr 2016

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kottayam
Kottayam
 
Complaint Case No. CC/79/2016
 
1. Mathew Philip
Edappallil House S.H. Mount P.O.
Kottayam
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Kerala Water Authority
Asst. Exe. Engineer
Kottayam
Kerala
2. The Asst. Engineer
Kerala Water Authority
Kottayam
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Bose Augustine PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. K.N Radhakrishnan Member
 HON'BLE MRS. Renu P. Gopalan MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:K.T. Jayaprakash, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KOTTAYAM

Present:

Hon’ble Mr. Bose Augustine, President

Hon’ble Mr. K.N. Radhakrishnan, Member 

Hon’ble Mrs. Renu P. Gopalan, Member

  C C No. 79/2016

Thursday, the  28th day of April, 2016.

 

Petitioner                                  :         Mathew Philip,

                                                          Advocate,

                                                          Edappallil House, S.H. Mount P.O.

                                                          Kottayam – 686 006.

                                                          (Adv. K.T. Jayaprakash)

                                                                   Vs.                                         

Opposite Parties                       : 1)     Kerala Water Authority,

                                                          Rep. by Assistant Executive Engineer,

                                                          Kottayam P.H. Sub division,

                                                          Kottayam – 686 002.

                                                2)       Assistant Engineer,

                                                          Kerala Water Authority,

                                                          Kottayam – 686 002.

 

O  R  D  E  R

 

Hon’ble Mr. Bose Augustine, President

 

          Petitioner, opposite parties 1 and 2 represented.  Counsel for petitioner submitted that complaint is not pressed and they filed memo.  Hence complaint is disposed as not pressed.

          Pronounced in the Open Fora on this the 28th day of April, 2016.

          Hon’ble Mr. Bose Augustine, President             Sd/-

          Hon’ble Mr. K.N. Radhakrishnan, Member      Sd/-

          Hon’ble Mrs. Renu P. Gopalan, Member          Sd/-

                                                                                                          By Order

                                                                                 Senior Superintendent

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Bose Augustine]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.N Radhakrishnan]
Member
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Renu P. Gopalan]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.