Kerala

Kollam

CC/42/2020

Adv.D.Ashapoornadev,38 years, - Complainant(s)

Versus

Kerala Water Authority, - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.SREENU RAVINDRAN

26 Oct 2022

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Civil Station ,
Kollam-691013.
Kerala.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/42/2020
( Date of Filing : 24 Jan 2020 )
 
1. Adv.D.Ashapoornadev,38 years,
S/o.L.Devadasan,Valiyathu,Alumpeedika.P.O,Clappana,Oachira.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Kerala Water Authority,
Jalabhavan,Vellayambalam,Thiruvananthapuram,Kerala-695 033.
2. Kerala Water Authority,
Asst.Executive Engineer Office,Public Health Sub Division,Edappallicottah,Chavara.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 26 Oct 2022
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOLLAM

DATED THIS THE 26th DAY OF OCTOBER 2022

Present: -      Sri.E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim, B.A, LLM. President

Smt.S.Sandhya   Rani. Bsc, LLB ,Member

           Sri.Stanly Harold, B.A.LLB, Member

CC.No.42/2020

Adv.D.Ashapoornadev, 38 years,

S/o L.Devadasan

Valiyathu, Alumpeedika P.O.                                                         :               Complainant      

V/s

  1. Kerala Water Authority,

        Jalabhavan, Vellayambalam,

            Thiruvananthapuram 695 033.

  1.    Kerala Water Authority,

            Asst.Executive Engineer office,

Public Health Sub Division,

Edappallicottah, Chavara.                                      :              Opposite Parties

 

ORDER

Sri. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM , B.A, LLM,President

                Complainant absent on this posting date also.  Opposite parties represented.  As the complainant is absent and no oral evidence adduced though case was listed for trial and relisted on several occasion the complainant is not turning up and adducing evidence.  Hence we are of the view that the complainant is not interested in adducing evidence.  Opposite party’s Advocate vehemently opposed in marking the documents produced along with the complaint which are only photocopies.  In the circumstances we are not inclined to accept the copy of documents without examining the complainant.  There is absolutely no evidence to prove the case of the complaint.

                In the result complaint stands dismissed.

                No costs.

Dated this the 26thday of October 2022.

 

      E.M .MUHAMMED IBRAHIM:Sd/-

S.SANDHYA RANI:Sd/-

                                                                                    STANLY HAROLD:Sd/-

                                                                                       Forwarded/by Order

                                                                             Senior superintendent

                                                                                                                                    

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.