Karnataka Leasing & Commercial Corporation Ltd., & 3 others V/S Dr. S. Rama Rao - Consumer Court Case

Karnataka

Mysore

CD/95/18

Dr. S. Rama Rao - Complainant(s)

Versus

Karnataka Leasing & Commercial Corporation Ltd., & 3 others - Opp.Party(s)

13 Feb 1995

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORE
No.1542/F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysore-570009.
consumer case(CC) No. CD/95/18

Dr. S. Rama Rao						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
Karnataka Leasing & Commercial Corporation Ltd., & 3 others						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Complaint was filed on 11/01/1995 claiming a total amount of Rs.39,000/- on the ground of deficiency in service of the opposite parties. According to the complaint the cause of action arose on 4.3.1992. Under Section 24 A of C.P. Act the complaint should have been filed within one year from 18/6/1993 the date on which S.24 A of the C.P. Act came into force or within 3 years from 4/3/1992 whichever is earlier. In otherwords it should have been filed on 18/6/1994. In fact complaint was filed on 11/1/1995. Therefore the complaint is dismissed as barred by limitation.

Complaint was filed on 11/01/1995 claiming a total amount of Rs.39,000/- on the ground of deficiency in service of the opposite parties.<br /> According to the complaint the cause of action arose on 4.3.1992. Under Section 24 A of C.P. Act the complaint should have been filed within one year from 18/6/1993 the date on which S.24 A of the C.P. Act came into force or within 3 years from 4/3/1992 whichever is earlier. In otherwords it should have been filed on 18/6/1994. In fact complaint was filed on 11/1/1995.<br /> Therefore the complaint is dismissed as barred by limitation.