Sukhvinder Kaur filed a consumer case on 09 May 2017 against Kapsons Fashion in the DF-II Consumer Court. The case no is CC/179/2017 and the judgment uploaded on 29 May 2017.
Chandigarh
DF-II
CC/179/2017
Sukhvinder Kaur - Complainant(s)
Versus
Kapsons Fashion - Opp.Party(s)
Jasjit Singh Adv.
09 May 2017
ORDER
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH
Kapsons Fashion, SCO 104-105, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh through its Authorized Representative.
…..Opposite Party
BEFORE: SH.RAJAN DEWAN PRESIDENT
SMT.PRITI MALHOTRA MEMBER
SH.RAVINDER SINGH MEMBER
ARGUED BY: Sh.Jasjit Singh, Adv. for complainant.
OP exparte.
PER RAJAN DEWAN, PRESIDENT
In brief, the case of the complainant as alleged by her is that the OP, in order to promote the sale of its products, offered discount @ 50% on the M.R.P. and she purchased an article of the MRP of Rs.2599/- vide Invoice dated 16.08.2016, Annexure C-1 for Rs.1364/- out of which a sum of Rs.65/- was charged towards VAT @ 5% on the discounted price. It has been averred that the MRP of the article was already inclusive of all taxes. She also objected to the charging of 5% VAT at the MRP of the article but to no effect. Alleging deficiency in service for the above act & conduct of the OP and also for the unfair trade practice resorted to by the OP, this complaint has been filed by the complainant.
Despite due service through registered post, none appeared on behalf of the OP and as such it was ordered to be proceeded against exparte vide order dated 05.04.2017.
The complainant led evidence in support of her contentions.
We have heard the Learned Counsel for the complainant and have also perused the record.
After hearing the Counsel for the complainant and going through the evidence on record, we are of the considered view that the complaint is liable to be dismissed for the reasons stated hereinafter. The complainant has produced on record a copy of the Invoice of the item in question from which it cannot be ascertained that as to whether the amount of the article in question is inclusive of all the taxes or not. The complainant has not produced on record a copy of the price tag of the article in question to corroborate the fact that the price of the article in question is inclusive of all the taxes and that the OP has illegally charged VAT on the discounted price. Hence, the complainant has failed to prove his case against the OP.
For the reasons recorded above, finding the complaint to be devoid of any merit, the same is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs.
The certified copy of this order be sent to the parties free of charge, after which the file be consigned.
Sd/-
Sd/-
Sd/-
Announced
(RAVINDER SINGH)
(RAJAN DEWAN)
(PRITI MALHOTRA)
09.05.2017
MEMBER
PRESIDENT
MEMBER
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.