NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/1380/2010

LIFE INSURANCE CORPN OF INDIA & ORS - Complainant(s)

Versus

KAPIL DEV SOOD - Opp.Party(s)

MR. BUDDY A. RANGANADHAN

04 Mar 2011

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 1380 OF 2010
 
(Against the Order dated 07/12/2009 in Appeal No. 247/2007 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)
1. LIFE INSURANCE CORPN OF INDIA & ORS
Through its Assistant Manager, Branch Office Unit. II, CO(Legal Cell), Northern Zone, H-Block, Connaught Place
New Delhi
Delhi
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. KAPIL DEV SOOD
R/o. 41, Bharari Bazar, Bharari
Shimla
Himachal Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.C. JAIN, PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. VINAY KUMAR, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :MR. BUDDY A. RANGANADHAN
For the Respondent :
Kapil Dev Soo, in person

Dated : 04 Mar 2011
ORDER

 

Mr. Buddy A. Ranganadhan, counsel representing the petitioner – LIC of India, under instructions, states that the conversion of the existing policy of Jeevan Chhaya to Jeevan Surabhi is permissible only if the insured / respondent undertakes to pay more premium viz. Rs.12,976/- per annum and in case, it is not acceptable to the complainant / insured the LIC of India is willing to refund him the entire deposited premiums alongwith surrender value of the existing lapsed Jeevan Chhaya policy amounting to Rs.51,513/-.
The respondent, Kapil Dev Sood present in person states that he cannot accept first offer as he is not in a financial lpositon to pay premium exceeding Rs.12,000/- per annum. He, however, prays that besides surrender value of the policy as is sought to be refunded, LIC may be asked to pay some interest. Mr. Ranganadhan states that there is no provision to pay any interest under the Rules of LIC of India.

Having considered the matter in its entirety and that even the surrender value of the policy has remained with the petitioner for about 7-8 years, we are of the view that besides amount of Rs.51,513/-, the LIC of India shall pay a lump sum of Rs.5,000/- to the respondent. This will not be constituted a precedent. Revision petition disposed of in this manner.

 
......................J
R.C. JAIN
PRESIDING MEMBER
......................
VINAY KUMAR
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.