Uttar Pradesh

StateCommission

A/2011/705

U P P C L - Complainant(s)

Versus

Kanti Devi - Opp.Party(s)

Isar Husain

31 Jul 2024

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UP
C-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010
 
First Appeal No. A/2011/705
( Date of Filing : 25 Apr 2011 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)
 
1. U P P C L
a
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Kanti Devi
a
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SUSHIL KUMAR PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. SUDHA UPADHYAY MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 31 Jul 2024
Final Order / Judgement

 

Oral

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

U.P. Lucknow.

Appeal No. 705 of 2011

1- Executive Engineer, Dachinanchal Vidyut

    Vitran Nigam Ltd., EUDD, Udai Singh Road,

    Aligarh.

2- Sub Divisional Officer,  Dachinanchal Vidyut

    Vitran Nigam Ltd., EUDD, Gular Road,

    Aligarh.                                                          …Appellants.

Versus

Smt. Kanti Devi w/o Sri Prem Babu,

R/o Mohalla Nagla Masani, Aligarh.               …Respondent.

Present:-

1- Hon’ble Sri Sushil Kumar, Presiding Member.

2- Hon’ble Smt. Sudha Upadhyay, Member.

Sri Isar Husain, Ld. counsel for the appellants.

Sri S.K. Sharma, Ld. counsel for the respondent.

Date  31.7.2024

JUDGMENT

Per Sri Sushil Kumar,  Member-   This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 23.3.2011 passed by the Ld. District Forum, Aligarh in complaint case no.210 of 2008, Smt. Kanti Devi vs. Executive Engineer, Dachinanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Aligarh  whereby the ld. District Forum rejected the bill dated 18.2.2009 amounting Rs.18,183.00 and further directed to issue amended bill against the complainant.

    As per the case of the complainant, she took electric connection for domestic purposes. The meter which was established at the residence of the complainant was not working properly. A complaint was made to the District Magistrate, Aligarh in this regard. The defendant installed a new meter on 20.2.2008 after receiving Rs.8,000.00 from the complainant but none of the official recorded the meter reading and submitted the electric bill amounting to Rs.18,183.00.

Since this fact was found as proved by the complainant, therefore, rejected this appeal and directed to issue an amended bill is not illegal. The appellant is at liberty to issue an amended bill as per the meter reading. Therefore, no harm is going to cause to the appellant with this order. The appeal is liable to be dismissed. 

ORDER

          Appeal is dismissed.

If any amount is deposited by the appellant at the time of filing of this appeal under section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, may be remitted to the ld. District Consumer Forum concerned as per rules alongwith accrued interest upto date.

The stenographer is requested to upload this order on the Website of this Commission today itself. 

          Certified copy of this judgment be provided to the parties as per rules.        

 

       (Sudha Upadhyay)                        (Sushil Kumar)                             

                Member                              Presiding Member

Jafri, PA I

Court 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SUSHIL KUMAR]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SUDHA UPADHYAY]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.