HARI OM SIKSHA SAMITI filed a consumer case on 03 Nov 2016 against KANTA in the StateCommission Consumer Court. The case no is A/23/2016 and the judgment uploaded on 02 Jan 2017.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA.
First Appeal No. 23 of 2016
Date of the Institution: 08.01.2016
Date of Decision:- 03.11.2016
1. Hari Om Siksha Samiti, Bassai, Mohindergarh through its Chairman, Akoda Road, Bassai, Tehsil and District Mohindergarh.
2. M.D. Institute of Nursing, Akoda Road, Bassai, Tehsil and District Mohindergarh through its Principal.
3. Smt. Savita Rao alias Savita Devi wife of Sunil Singh alias Sunil Kumar son of Sh. Babu Lal, resident of Village Bassai, Tehsil and District Mohindergarh.
4. Sunil Singh alias Sunil Kumar son of Sh. Babu Lal, resident of Village Bassai, Tehsil and District Mohindergarh.
……..Appellants-Opposite Parties
Versus
Kanta daughter of Sh. Hanuman wife of Sh. Anand, resident of Village Lisan, Tehsil and District Rewari.
….. Respondent-Complainant
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.
Mr. Diwan Singh Chauhan, Member.
Present:- Shri V.M. Handa, Advocate for the appellants
Shri R.S. Randhwa, Advocate for the respondent-complainant
O R D E R
NAWAB SINGH J, (ORAL)
Hari Om Siksha Samiti and others-opposite parties have challenged the correctness and legality of the order dated January 16th, 2014, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Narnaul (for short ‘District Forum’) whereby complaint filed by Suman-complainant was allowed. Operative part of the order is reproduced as under:-
“12. Resultantly, we allow the complaint of complainant and direct the opposite parties to refund Rs.45,000/- received by them vide receipts Annexures C-1 and C-2 alongwith interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of deposit till the date of payment and also order to pay a compensation of Rs.25,000/- for the loss of two years of the complainant causing mental agony and harassment. The opposite parties are also liable to pay the litigation cost to the complainant, which we quantify at Rs.1500/-. Further, the opposite parties are directed to return the original certificates to the complainant…...”
2. On August 01st, 2016, Sunil Singh alias Sunil Kumar on behalf of the appellants made the following statement:-
“I am ready to pay the principal amount, that is, Rs.45,000/-, which I had charged from the complainant on or before September 08th, 2016 in case the complainant agrees to compromise the matter”
3. The proposal given by the appellants has been accepted by the learned counsel for the complainant. Learned counsel for the complainant has received demand draft of Rs.20,000/- (photocopy Annexure A-11) from the appellants in full and final settlement of the claim of the complainant. He has further stated that the statutory amount of Rs.25,000/- deposited at the time of filing the appeal be released in favour of Kanta-complainant.
4. Learned counsel for the appellants has also made a statement that the original documents of complainant shall be delivered to her at her address within thirty days from the date of receipt of this order.
5. In view of above, the appeal is disposed of accordingly.
6. The statutory amount of Rs.25000/- deposited at the time of filing the appeal be refunded to the complainant against proper receipt and identification in accordance with rules.
Announced 03.11.2016 | (Diwan Singh Chauhan) Member |
| (Nawab Singh) President |
UK
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.