NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/120/2009

M/S. GODREJ PHOTO -ME - LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

KANCHAN J MUSALE - Opp.Party(s)

M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.

20 Jan 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 120 OF 2009
(Against the Order dated 13/01/2009 in Appeal No. 134/2009 of the State Commission Karnataka)
1. M/S. GODREJ PHOTO -ME - LTD. Now Known as Godrej Hicare India Ltd., Pirojshanagar, Eastern Express Highway, Vikhroli (East)Mumbai -400 079MAHARASHTRA ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. KANCHAN J MUSALE W/o Jayakar Musale, Kanchan Colour Lab, 10/C, Eureka Towers, Traffice IslandHubli - 29 ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.N.P. SINGH ,PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. S.K. NAIK ,MEMBER
For the Petitioner :NEMO
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 20 Jan 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and respondent.  During pendency of proceeding before this Commission on a move by petitioner, execution of warrant issued during execution proceeding against petitioner – Authority was stayed by this Commission subject to deposit of Rs.15 lakhs with the National Commission.   We on hearing the parties remitted the matter to State Commission for fresh consideration of the issue involved giving opportunity to the petitioner to address the issue.  It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that since now this Commission is not in sesion of proceeding, petitioner be permitted to withdraw the deposit made by them.  We accordingly direct the petitioner to withdraw the deposited amount of Rs.15 lakhs with this Commission.  Respondent would be at liberty to proceed with execution proceeding pending before the District Forum. 

Miscellaneous application is disposed of accordingly.

 

 



......................JB.N.P. SINGHPRESIDING MEMBER
......................S.K. NAIKMEMBER