Madhya Pradesh

StateCommission

RP/13/63

EUREKA FORBES LTD - Complainant(s)

Versus

KAMLESH TRIPATHI - Opp.Party(s)

SH. ANURAG KHASKALAM

28 Feb 2019

ORDER

M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPAL

PLOT NO.76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL

                              

                                    REVISION PETITION NO. 63 OF 2013

(Arising out of order dated 22.05.2013 passed in C.C.No.07/2013 by the District Forum, Bhopal)

 

EUREKA FORBES LIMITED.                                                                                   …          PETITIONER.

 

Versus

 

KAMLESH KUMAR TRIPATHI.                                                                                 …         RESPONDENT.

 

BEFORE:

 

                  HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHANTANU S. KEMKAR    :      PRESIDENT

                  HON’BLE DR.  MRS MONIKA MALIK                           :      MEMBER               

 

                                      O R D E R

28.02.2019

 

          None for the petitioner.

            Shri Sushil Goswami, learned counsel for the respondent.

 

As per Shri Justice Shantanu S. Kemkar : 

                       

                         None appeared for the petitioner.

2.                     This revision is directed against the order dated 22.05.2013 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bhopal (for short ‘Forum’) in C.C.No.07/2013.

3.                     Petitioner has challenged the order dated 22.05.2013.  In fact, the petitioner ought to have challenged the order dated 01.03.2013.  Be that as it may. Since today we have allowed the appeal no. 1464/2014 filed by the complainant against the order dated 18.06.2014 by which the complaint has been dismissed and have remanded the case for fresh consideration and decision of the complaint, we dispose of this revision with liberty to petitioner to contest the matter before the Forum as learned counsel for complainant has not opposed giving of an opportunity to petitioner to file written statement and to contest the matter.

4.                     With the aforesaid direction, this revision petition is disposed of.

 

 

            (Justice Shantanu S. Kemkar)            (Dr. Monika Malik)             

                     President                                         Member