Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/72/2018

Allahabad Bank, Chengalpattu Branch - Complainant(s)

Versus

Kalaivani Medicals - Opp.Party(s)

M.Vijaya Lakshmi

31 Jul 2023

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                             MEMBER

 

F.A. No.72/2018

 

(Against the Order dt.13.10.2015 made in C.C. No.117/2014 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Chennai (South))

DATED THE 31^ST DAY OF JULY 2023

 

 

Smt. Amudhapriya,

Proprietrix,

M/s. C.P.K. Leathers,

No.18, Cuddapah Rangaiah Street,

Periamet,

Chennai – 600 003.                                                       .. Appellant / Complainant.

 

-Versus-

1. Air India,

Represented by its Manager-Cargo Export,

No.19, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Salai,

Egmore,

Chennai – 600 008.  

 

2. FLYWAYS’s Air Cargo,

IATA Shipping, Clearing & Forwarding &

Customs House Agent,

No.19, Perianna Maistry Street,

Periamet,

Chennai – 600 003.

 

3. S.S. Velan & Co.,

Shipping, Clearing & Forwarding Agent,

No.10/2, Second Floor,

Shaik Ali Subedar Street,

Periamet,

Chennai – 600 003.                                       .. Respondents / Opposite parties.  

 

Counsel for Appellant / Complainant                     : M/s. C.A. Sharmila

Counsel for 2^nd Respondent / 2^nd Opposite party  : M/s. R.R.N. Legal Associates

Counsel for 3^rd Respondent / 3^rd Opposite party   : M/s. B. Sathish Sundar

1^st Respondent / 1^st Opposite party                       : Dismissed

 

                This appeal coming up before us on 31.07.2023 for appearance of both parties and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:     

                                                                                       

Docket Order

 

         No representation for both parties.  

This appeal is posted today for appearance of both parties and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the appellant was not present.   Hence, passed it over and called again at 01.00 P.M. still, there is no representation for the appellant.   Hence, we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, this appeal is dismissed for default.    No costs.

 

               

                Sd/-                                                                                              Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                        R.SUBBIAH                        

             MEMBER                                                                                     PRESIDENT