Date of Filing      :  06.02.2020 

                                                                                                                        Date of Disposal: 04 .08.2022

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

THIRUVALLUR

 

 BEFORE  TMT. Dr.S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L, Ph.D (Law)                            .…. PRESIDENT

                 THIRU. J.JAYASHANKAR, B.A, B.L.                                                                      ..… MEMBER-I

                 THIRU P.MURUGAN, B.Com.,                                                                              ….. MEMBER-II

CC. No.11/2020

THIS THURSDAY, THE 04th DAY OF AUGUST 2022

 

R.Ganesh, S/o. Ramamurthy,

No.22, Sasthiri Nagar,

Periya Sekkadu,

M.M.C. Chennai -600 051.                                                                                             ....Complainant.

                                                                                       //Vs//

K.Thirugnanasumbanthan Rajalakshmi Mahal,

Rep. by its Manager,

No.9, Kamarajar Salai,

(Manali) Madhavaram, Chennai -600 051.                                                                ....Opposite party.

 

Counsel for the complainant                 : Mr.M.Prabakar, Advocate.

Counsel for the opposite party                                                   : Mr.Adithiyaa Nithiyan, Advocate.

 

 

ORDER

PRONOUNCED BY TMT. Dr.S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI,   PRESIDENT.

 

               The complaint was filed by the complainant U/S 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party along with prayer to direct the opposite party to return the amount of Rs.20,000/- received as an advance for booking of the Marriage Mahal with interest and to pay a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- towards loss sustained for cancellation of the Mahal and to pay a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- towards the mental agony and for damages suffered by the complainant.

No representation for complainant inspite of sufficient opportunities given.  This Commission of the view that there is no purpose in keeping the complaint on file.  Hence Complaint dismissed for non prosecution.  No cost.

This order was pronounced by us in the open Commission on this 04th August 2022.

 

     Sd-                                                                        Sd-                                                               Sd-

MEMBER-II                                                        MEMBER-I                                                 PRESIDENT