KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
VAZHUTHACAUD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
APPEAL NO.134/11
JUDGMENT DATED 12.4.2011
PRESENT
JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU -- PRESIDENT
1. Joy John, Managing Partner
M/s.Devdhan Lottery Services,
Jyothis Project, DLS 40/8942 C,
M.G.Road,
Ernakulam – 682011
2. M/s.Jyothis Project, -- APPELLANTS
Reptd. by its Branch Manager
Trident Arcade, Pinangode Road,
Kalpetta, Wayanad.
(By Adv.O.V.Maniprasad & Ors.)
Vs.
K.Suresh, Karimbummal House,
Panamaram P.O,
Mananthavady Taluk, -- RESPONDENT
Wayanad.
JUDGMENT
JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU.PRESIDENT
The appellants are the opposite parties in CC.160/10 in the file of CDRF, Waynad. The appellants are under orders to return the deposited amount with interest at 12% and cost of Rs.3,000/-.
2. The case of the complainant is that he had deposited an amounts in his name, in the name of his wife, daughter and son in the project of the opposite parties as per assurance that the amounts shall be refunded in double within a short period. It is his case that nothing has been returned. He has sought for refund a sum of Rs.75,000/- with interest at the rate of 18%.
3. It is the case of the opposite parties that the amounts were received in deposit with undertaking to buy the lottery tickets and magazines. It is denied that there is an offer to return the amount in double within hundred weeks.
4. The evidence adduced consisted of the testimony of PW1 and Exts.A1 to A5.
5. We find that the opposite parties have not tendered any evidence. The deposits are evidenced by Exts.A1 to A4 respectively. The assurance is proved vide Ext.A1 copy of the advertisement. The Forum has only ordered to refund the deposited amount with interest at 12%. On a perusal of the order of the Forum, we find that there is no patent illegality. There is no scope for admitting the appeal.
6. In the result, the appeal is dismissed in limine.
Office will forward the copy of this order to the Forum.
JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU -- PRESIDENT
