NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/4409/2009

C.S. PRADEEPAN - Complainant(s)

Versus

K.S.E. BOARD & ANR. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. N.M. VARGHESE

04 Jan 2010

ORDER

Date of Filing: 30 Nov 2009

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/4409/2009
(Against the Order dated 26/06/2009 in Appeal No. 1043/2004 of the State Commission Kerala)
1. C.S. PRADEEPANKoickal House, Parampuzha, P.O. Properieto, C S Rubber Industries I.D.P., Poovanthuruth P.O. Kottayam,Kerala ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. K.S.E. BOARD & ANR.ThiruvanthapuramThiruvanthapuramKerala2. The Asst. EngineerK.S.E. Board, Electrical Section Nattakom, Pallom Major Section,KottayamKerala ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. B.K. TAIMNI ,MEMBER
For the Appellant :MR. N.M. VARGHESE
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 04 Jan 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

          Delay of 18 days in filing the revision petition is condoned.

          We agree with the view taken by the State Commission that the petitioner is not a ‘Consumer’ under the provisions of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.  Revision Petition is dismissed.


-2-

          This, however, would not debar the petitioner from seeking redressal of his grievance in any other forum.



......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................B.K. TAIMNIMEMBER