Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/1/09

M/S KAVERI INDIANE SERVICES,LPG GAS DEALER - Complainant(s)

Versus

K.RAJARAM - Opp.Party(s)

M/S MANNE HARI BABU

07 Mar 2011

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/1/09
(Arisen out of Order Dated 02/12/2008 in Case No. C.C.No.21/2008 of District Chittoor-II at triputi)
 
1. M/S KAVERI INDIANE SERVICES,LPG GAS DEALER
H.NO.19-56/1/4, HYDERABAD ROAD, NEAR BUS DEPARTMENT, SIDDIPET-502 103.
MEDAK
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. K.RAJARAM
POST AND VILLAGE, GUDIKANDULA, MANDAL THOGUTTA, DIST.MEDAK.
MEDAK
Andhra Pradesh
2. DIST CIVIL SUPPLY OFFICER
CIVIL SUPPLY GODOWNS, MANJEERA NAGAR, SANGAREDDY-502 001.
SANGAREDDY
ANDHRA PRADESH
3. L.P.G.INDIAN AREA OFFICER
AREA MANAGER, H.NO.3-6-336, 2ND FLOOR, NARSAPUR HOUSE, HIMAYATHNAGAR, HYD-29.
HYDERABAD
ANDHRA PRADESH
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION ATHYDERABAD

 

F.A.No.1 OF 2009 AGAINST C.C.No.21 OF 2008 DISTRICT FORUM MEDAK AT SANGAREDDY.

 

Between:

M/s Kaveri Indane Services
LPG Gas Dealer, H.No.19-56/1/4
Hyderabad Road, Near Bus Depot
Siddipet-103

                                                               

A N D

1.           

                                                               2.                  nd                         

                                               

       

Counsel for the Appellant                    

Counsel for the Respondents No.1 & 2             

 

QUORUM:  

AND

SRI R.LAKSHMINARASIMHA RAO, HON’BLE MEMBER

 

MONDAY THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH

  

 

Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Hon’ble Member)

                                                       1.    

2.        

3.      

 4.   

5.      

6.     The President of the District Forum has dismissed the complaint on the premise that the complainant was not present at his house when the opposite party no.1 attempted to supply the refill on three occasions and on all the three occasions the complainant’s house was found locked. 

7.    `10,000/- towards compensation and costs. 

8.      

9.    

1)                                       Whether the opposite parties no.1 and 2 were guilty of negligence in supply of the LPG refill to the complainant?

2)                                       To what relief?

 

 

10.               

11.           

12.        

13.      In the circumstances of the case there shall be no order as to the costs in the appeal. 

 

 

                                                                

                                                                                                                      KMK*

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.