K.P.F.Private Ltd.Maruthi Show Room. V/S A.Mareppa S/o Hanumantappa - Consumer Court Case

Karnataka

Raichur

CC/09/43

A.Mareppa S/o Hanumantappa - Complainant(s)

Versus

K.P.F.Private Ltd.Maruthi Show Room. - Opp.Party(s)

Sri.C.A.Rubb

07 Dec 2009

ORDER

DIST. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
DIST. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,DC Office Compound, Sath Kacheri
consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/43

A.Mareppa S/o Hanumantappa						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
K.P.F.Private Ltd.Maruthi Show Room. Senior Engineer,						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Advocate for complainant absent. No one represented his case. Advocate for opposite No- 1 & 2 present and filed for to grant further time as complainant is not showing interest in prosecuting th case. On perusal of the order sheet it reveals that complainant remained absent on all previous hearing dates. Today also he remained absent and his advocate remained absent and his advocate remained absent. Any how it is kept for some time for the evidence of complaint. Case called out again advocate for complainant absent complainant also absent. ADvocate for opposite No 1 & 2 present. In view of the absence of complainant and his advocate. This complaint is dismised for non-prosecution as default. Sd/- Sri. Pampapathi, President, District Forum-Raichur. Sd/- Sri. Gururaj, Member, District Forum-Raichur. Sd/- Smt.Pratibha Rani Hiremath, Member. District Forum-Raichur.

Advocate for complainant absent. No one represented his case. Advocate for opposite No- 1 & 2 present and filed for to grant further time as complainant is not showing interest in prosecuting th case. On perusal of the order sheet it reveals that complainant remained absent on all previous hearing dates. Today also he remained absent and his advocate remained absent and his advocate remained absent. Any how it is kept for some time for the evidence of complaint. Case called out again advocate for complainant absent complainant also absent. ADvocate for opposite No 1 & 2 present. In view of the absence of complainant and his advocate. This complaint is dismised for non-prosecution as default. Sd/- Sri. Pampapathi, President, District Forum-Raichur. Sd/- Sri. Gururaj, Member, District Forum-Raichur. Sd/- Smt.Pratibha Rani Hiremath, Member. District Forum-Raichur.