BEML Employees Credit Co-operative Society (Regd.) - Complainant(s)
Versus
K.Nataraj - Opp.Party(s)
11 Nov 2009
ORDER
THE DISTRICT CONSUMAR DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM No.419, Ist Floor,. H.N. Gowda Building, M.B.Road, Kolar-563101 consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/84
BEML Employees Credit Co-operative Society (Regd.)
...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
K.Nataraj Medical Officer
...........Respondent(s)
BEFORE:
Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
ORDER
CC Filed on 08.09.2009 Disposed on 13.11.2009 BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KOLAR. Dated: 13th day of November 2009 PRESENT: Sri. G.V.HEGDE, President. Sri. T.NAGARAJA, Member. Smt. K.G.SHANTALA, Member. --- Consumer Complaint No. 84/2009 Between: BEML Employees Credit Co-operative Society (Regd.), Maharaja Road, Robertsonpet, Kolar Gold Fields. Represented by its: Secretary. .Complainant V/S 1. K. Nataraj, Primary Health Unit, Anni Hally via Kembodi, Kolar. 2. The Medical Officer, Primary Health Unit, Anni Hally via Kembodi, Kolar. .Opposite Parties ORDERS This is a complaint filed under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 praying for a direction against the opposite party No.2 to effect prompt deduction of the loan installments as undertaken by him and to credit the same to complainant-society with costs, etc., 2. The material facts of complainants case may be stated as follows: That the complainant is a credit co-operative society and OP.1 who is working as a government servant, is an associate member of complainant society and that OP.1 had borrowed Rs.50,000/- on 27.08.2003 agreeing to repay the loan and interest in certain installments. Further that OP.1 has been working under OP.2 who is Pay Disbursing Officer and that OP.2 had undertaken by his letter dated 07.08.2003 to deduct the installments becoming due out of the salary payable to OP.1 and to remit the same to complainant society and that OP.2 failed to deduct the said installments as undertaken and to remit to complainant-society. It is alleged that OP.1 has also failed to repay the loan and the installments. It is alleged that for the present certain amount is outstanding in the said loan account of OP.1. 3. In response to the notice issued by this Forum, OP No.1 and 2 appeared and OP.1 admitted the loan transaction and OP.2 admitted to make deduction of installment out of the salary payable to OP.1 in future. They also stated that certain amount has been already repaid to complainant-society towards repayment of loan and interest. 4. In view of the above facts we pass the following: O R D E R The complaint is allowed. OP.2 is directed to deduct the loan installments due by OP.1 out of the monthly salary payable to OP.1 and to credit the same to complainant-society. The parties shall bear their own costs. Dictated to the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced in open Forum this the 13th day of November 2009. MEMBER MEMBER PRESIDENT
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
