IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI
BEFORE Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE. R. SUBBIAH :: PRESIDENT
Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI :: MEMBER
CC. No. 243/2015
DATED THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST 2021
1.Gopi,
2.Palani,
Both residing at
No.52, VSM Garden street,
Jafferkhanpet,
Chennai-83 ..Complainant
Vs
1.Kishore.K,
No.1/59, Sathanoor,
Kallakuruchi,
Villupuram District,
Enrolment No.2609/2010
2. Kaviyanathan, D.O.
Senganiamman Koil street,
Ganapathyapuram,
East Tambaram
Chennai – 59
Enrolment No. 2033/2006 ..opposite parties
Counsel for complainant : M/s Gopi & Palani
Counsel for 1st opposite party : R.Ganesh Kumar
Counsel for 2nd opposite party : M/s S.Shrenik Raj
This complaint coming on before us for hearing today, this Commission made the following order in open court :-
Docket order
No representation for complainant in person. Opposite parties present. Proof affidavit of complainant not filed. This complaint is posted today for appearance of both and for filing proof affidavit of both or for dismissal. Complainant remained absent for the past many hearings. Today also there is no representation for the complainant. The complaint is of the year 2015. Now almost six years completed. But the complainant had not taken any efforts to appear and file their proof affidavit and conduct the case. The absence of the complainant shows that the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Therefore no useful purpose will be served in keeping the complaint on file. Hence the complaint is dismissed for default. No cost.
Sd/- Sd/-
S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI R. SUBBIAH
MEMBER PRESIDENT
