Kerala

StateCommission

A/08/162

NEW KANNAPURAM CHITTIES PVT. LTD - Complainant(s)

Versus

K.K.RAVI - Opp.Party(s)

R.S.KALKURA

29 Jul 2009

ORDER


.
CDRC, Sisuvihar Lane, Sasthamangalam.P.O, Trivandrum-10
Appeal(A) No. A/08/162

NEW KANNAPURAM CHITTIES PVT. LTD
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

K.K.RAVI
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


For the Appellant :


For the Respondent :




ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
               VAZHUTHACAUD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
                                             
                                                APPEAL NO.162/08
                             JUDGMENT DATED 29.7.09
 
PRESENT
              
JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU           -- PRESIDENT
SRI.M.K.ABDULLA SONA                                      -- MEMBER
 
New Kannapuram Chitties Pvt.Ltd.,
P.O.Chettupuzha.
2. New Kannapuram Chitties Pvt.Ltd.                           -- APPELLANTS
rep. by Managing Director,
Gopalakrishna.
   (By Adv.G.S.kalkura)
 
                    Vs.
K.K.Ravi.
Karanath House, P.O.Chettupuzha,                     -- RESPONDENT
Thrissur.
   (By Adv.Liji K.V & Ors)
 
JUDGMENT
 
JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU,PRESIDENT
 
          The appellant is the opposite party in OP No.1039/04 in the file of CDRF, Thrissur. The appellant is under orders to return the amount of Rs.4,500/- with 12% interest to the complainant and also costs of Rs.500/-.
          2. It is the case of the complainant that he has a subscriber to the chit with the opposite party. The monthly instalment was Rs.500/-. Altogether, a sum of Rs.4,500/- was deposited. According to him, on the 9th month he auctioned the chit   for Rs.12,000/-. Although, sureties were furnished the amount was not given. Hence, he sought for return of the amount paid.
          3. According to the opposite party/appellant, the complainant was remitted only a sum of Rs.2,664/- and also alleged that no sureties were furnished. After auction no instalments were remitted.
          4. We find that no evidence was adduced before the Forum. The appellant has produced herein certain documents to support his contentions. It appears that the Forum has not considered the contentions in this regard.
              
5. In the circumstances, the order of the Forum is set aside. The matter is remitted back to the Forum. The Forum is directed to permit the parties to adduce evidence and dispose of the case by a considered order.
          6. The matter will stand posted before the Forum on 16.9.2009.
          The office is directed to dispatch the copy of this order to the Forum urgently.
 
JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU          -- PRESIDENT
 
 
 M.K.ABDULLA SONA                     -- MEMBER
 
 
S/L
 



......................JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU