DATE OF FILING                    :     27-06-2013.

DATE OF S/R                            :      13-09-2013.

DATE OF FINAL ORDER      :     12-09-2014.

Sri Kaustoov Pal,

son of Dwijendra Kumar Pal,

of village and P.O. Ramnagar, P.S. Shyampur,

District – Howrah,

represented by his constituted attorney

Sri Kausum Pal,

son of Sri  Dwijendra Kumar Pal,

residing at 62/11/1, Ichapur Road, P.S. Bantra,

P.O.  Santragachi, District – Howrah.  ------------------------------------- COMPLAINANTS.

-          Versus   -

1.      K.C. Panja &  Son,

proprietorship concern

represented by sole proprietor

Sri Susnata Panja,

son of late kartick Chandra Panja

of Ichapur Canel Side ( Purbapara ), P.O. Santragachi,

P.s. Jagacha, District – Howrah,

PIN  – 711104.--------------------------------------------------------OPPOSITE PARTY.

                                                P    R    E     S    E    N     T

President     :     Shri T.K. Bhattacharya, M.A. LL.B. WBHJS.

Member      :      Shri P.K. Chatterjee.

Member       :     Smt. Jhumki Saha.

                                                 F  I   N   A    L       O   R   D    E     R

1.               The instant case was filed by complainant U/S 12 of the C.P. Act, 1986 wherein the complainant has  prayed for direction upon the o.p. no. 2  to execute and register the sale deed in favour of the complainant with respect to the suit flat together with the garage as per agreement dated 27-01-2010 and to pay compensation of Rs. 1 lakh together with litigation costs of Rs. 5,000/-.  

2.               The o.p. in the written version contended interalia that as the complainant did not pay extra amount for the excess area the deed could not be executed; that there is no deficiency in service on the part of the o.p.

3.        Upon pleadings of both parties two points arose for determination :

i)          Is there any deficiency in service on the part of the O.P.  ?

ii)                  Whether the complainants are  entitled to get any relief as prayed for ? 

DECISION  WITH   REASONS      :

4.               Both the points are  taken up together for consideration. Admittedly the total agreed amount of Rs. 14,85,000/- has been paid to the o.ps. for the schedule mentioned flat measuring 1150 sq. ft. together with the garage measuring 120 sq. ft. The claim of the o.p. for extra money for excess 9 sq. ft. is just an attempt to fleece money from the complainant. We are only concerned with the agreement dated 27-01-2010. Naturally the o.p. cannot have any escape from the rigours of law. We are, therefore, of the view that this is a fit case where the prayer of the complainant shall be allowed.

           Both the points are accordingly disposed.    

      Hence,

O     R     D      E      R      E        D

      That the C. C. Case No.  211 of 2013 ( HDF 211  of 2013 )  be  and the same is allowed on contest with  costs  against  the O.P., K.C. Panja. 

      The O.P. be directed to execute and register proper sale deed with respect to the schedule property in favour of the complainant within 30 days from the date of this order.

      The o.p. do also pay a sum of Rs. 30,000/- to the complainant as compensation  for causing mental pain and unnecessary  harassment and Rs. 5,000/- as litigation costs.

      The complainant is at liberty to put the decree into execution after expiry of the appeal period.

      Supply the copies of the order to the parties, as per rule.

DICTATED  &    CORRECTED

BY   ME.  

  (    T.K. Bhattacharya  )                                              

  President,  C.D.R.F., Howrah.