Kerala

Palakkad

CC/69/2011

T.V.Krishnadas - Complainant(s)

Versus

K.A.Saju - Opp.Party(s)

23 May 2011

ORDER

 
CC NO. 69 Of 2011
 
1. T.V.Krishnadas
S/o.Kesavadas, "Krishnakripa", Kodikkamkunnu, P.O.Kumaranellur, Palakkad - 679 552. (Rep.by P.A.Holder C.Kesavadas)
Palakkad
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. K.A.Saju
Managing Director, M/s.Apple A Day Properties P.Ltd., Apple Tower, Palarivattom - Edappalli ByPass Road, Palarivattom (PO), Cochin - 682 025
Ernakulam
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONORABLE Smt.Seena.H PRESIDENT
 HONORABLE Smt.Bhanumathi.A.K Member
 HONORABLE Smt.Preetha.G.Nair Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM  PALAKKAD

Dated this the 23rd  day of May   2011

 

Present  : Smt.Seena H, President

             : Smt. Preetha.G. Nair, Member       

             : Smt. Bhanumathi.A.K, Member                                        Date of filing: 16/05/2011 

 

 

                                                                         (C.C.No.69/2011)                                              

T.V.Krishnadas

S/o.Kesavadas

“Krishnakripa”

Kodikkamkunnu,

P.O.Kumaranellur,

(Rep.by P.A.Holder

C.Kesavadas)

Palakkad                                                                          -            Complainant

                       

V/s

K.A.Saju

Managing Director,

M/s.Apple a Day Properties P.Ltd.

Apple Tower,

Palarivattorm – Edapalli ByePass Road

Palarivattom (PO),

Ernakulam.                                                                    -           Opposite party                                             

 

O R D E R

           

            By  Smt.SEENA.H, PRESIDENT

 

            Complainant alleging deficiency in service on the part of opposite party for the delay in completing and delivering the apartment as agreed by opposite party.

Complaint posted for hearing on admission. Complainant present.  Heard.

 

On going through the complaint it is seen that this Forum has no territorial jurisdiction  to entertain the complaint since the opposite party neither  resides nor carries on business within the jurisdiction  of the Forum.  No cause of action is also seen to arise within the jurisdiction  of the Forum.

 

Hence, without going into the merits of the case, we dismiss the complaint with direction to approach appropriate Forum for relief.

 

Pronounced in the open court on this the 23rd day of May 2011.

 

                                                                                                    Sd/-

Seena H

President

     Sd/-

Preetha G Nair

Member

      Sd/-

Bhanumathi.A.K.

   Member

 

 
 
[HONORABLE Smt.Seena.H]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONORABLE Smt.Bhanumathi.A.K]
Member
 
[HONORABLE Smt.Preetha.G.Nair]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.