NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/4090/2009

DR. SURENDRA SHETTY KUDLADY - Complainant(s)

Versus

K. GANAPATHI SHENOY & ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. G.V. CHANDRASHEKAR

20 Nov 2009

ORDER

Date of Filing: 06 Nov 2009

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/4090/2009
(Against the Order dated 18/08/2009 in Appeal No. 824/2009 of the State Commission Karnataka)
1. DR. SURENDRA SHETTY KUDLADYSpine Care, Near Hotel Leela, Seshadripuram, Bangalore - 560 020KARNATAKA ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. K. GANAPATHI SHENOY & ORS.Shricharan D No.2-63(2), Sacheripete - 576 128Udupi Taluk & DistrictKARNATAKA2. NATATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.Ganesh Mahal, Municipal Main Road,Kundrapura - 576 201KARNATAKA ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. B.K. TAIMNI ,MEMBER
For the Appellant :MR. G.V. CHANDRASHEKAR
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 20 Nov 2009
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

          State Commission, while remanding the case, has recorded certain findings.  Counsel for the petitioner states that the District Forum should decide the complaint afresh without being influenced by any of the observations made by the State Commission in its order.

          District Forum shall decide the complaint afresh without being influenced by any of the findings recorded by the State Commission in its order.

 



......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................B.K. TAIMNIMEMBER