Karnataka

StateCommission

A/1709/2014

Vishwabharathi House Building Co-operative Society Ltd - Complainant(s)

Versus

K Babu Lal Jain - Opp.Party(s)

Chandrashekar

02 Aug 2021

ORDER

KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.
 
First Appeal No. A/1709/2014
( Date of Filing : 20 Dec 2014 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/11/2014 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/197/2013 of District Bangalore Urban)
 
1. Vishwabharathi House Building Co-operative Society Ltd
No.35, Rathna Vilas Road, Basavanagudi, Bangalore-560004, Rept by its Secretary, Sri H.V.Vadiraj
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. K Babu Lal Jain
R/a No.414, 14th cross, Shastrinagar, Bangalore-560028 .
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Ravishankar PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt.Sunita Channabasappa Bagewadi MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 02 Aug 2021
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE BEFORE THE KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

Basava Bhavan, Sri Basaveswara Circle, High grounds, Bangalore-560001.

 

Case No. - A/1709/2014


Appellant/s

1 . Vishwabharathi House Building Co-operative Society Ltd .
No.35, Rathna Vilas Road, Basavanagudi, Bangalore-560004, Rept by its Secretary, Sri H.V.Vadiraj
(By Chandrashekar)

-Versus-

Respondent/s

1 . K Babu Lal Jain .
R/a No.414, 14th cross, Shastrinagar, Bangalore-560028 .
(By Svd)

 

02.08.2021

ORDER

Mr. RAVISHANKAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER

1.        The appellant/complainant filed this appeal way back in the year 2014 being aggrieved by the Order dt.20.11.2014 passed in CC.No.197/2013 on the file of Bangalore Urban District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bangalore wherein the District Commission has partly allowed the complaint which directed the Opposite Party to refund Rs.10,48,000/- along with interest at 16% p.a. from the date of respective payments within 30 days from the date of the Order.  Failing which, the Opposite Party shall pay the said amount to the complainant along with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of respective payment, till the date of realization.  The Opposite Party further directed to pay Rs.5,000/- to the complainant as costs of litigation.

2.        The appellant not appeared before this Commission inspite of giving sufficient opportunities to address his arguments and to convince how the impugned order passed by the District Commission is not satisfactory and against to law. 

3.        The case called twice, appellant not present.

4.        We have perused the appeal memo.  Mere memorandum of appeal is not sufficient to hold the appeal in the absence of any arguments and convincement by the appellant.  As such, the appeal requires to be dismissed.  Accordingly, appeal is dismissed.

The amount in deposit shall be transmitted to the District Commission for disbursement of the same to the complainant.

Forward free copies to both parties.

   

     Sd/-                                                                       Sd/-

MEMBER                                                      JUDICIAL MEMBER

KCS*

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ravishankar]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt.Sunita Channabasappa Bagewadi]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.