Chandigarh

DF-I

EA/39/2009

Mrs. Meeran Jee Sharma - Complainant(s)

Versus

JVG Investment, 806, Bhikhaji Cama Bhawan, Bhikahji Cama Palace, New Delhi- - Opp.Party(s)

24 Dec 2009

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM - I Plot No 5- B, Sector 19 B, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh - 160 019
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 39 of 2009
1. Mrs. Meeran Jee SharmaW/o Dr. P.R.Sharma, R/o 1211, Sector8/C, chandigarh ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 24 Dec 2009
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I

U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

                                                            Execution Application No. 39 of 2009

                        in

                                    Complaint Case No. 709 of 2000

Mrs.Meeran Jee Sharma  –  Complainant.

                        Versus

 

J.V.G Investment, New Delhi – Opposite Party (OP)..

 

Present:          None for Complainant/DH.

                                                                                   

                                                            ORDER

 

                        The case called out several times but neither the complainant nor anybody else on her behalf has turned up. Notice of the application was sent to OP but the same had been received back with the report “shifted”. The certificate issued u/s 25(3) of the C.P.Act to the Collector, Bhikaji Cama Palace, New Delhi had been received back with the report “incomplete address”. The complainant was to furnish the correct address & particulars of OP or concerned District Collector but it appears that she has not been able to find out the same and therefore none has appeared for the complainant. The application is accordingly dismissed for non prosecution. However, the complainant may file afresh application as and when the correct address of OPs comes to her knowledge, as permitted by law.

                        Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.

 

 

24.12.2009   (MADHU BEHL)       (SIDDHESHWAR SHARMA)        (JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL)

                          MEMBER                                 MEMBER                                  PRESIDENT



MR. SIDDHESHWAR SHARMA, MEMBERHONABLE MR. JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL, PRESIDENT DR. MADHU BEHL, MEMBER