Chandigarh

StateCommission

FA/7/2014

Vikson Commodities Private Limited - Complainant(s)

Versus

Just Dial Private Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. P.K.Kukreja Adv.

13 Jan 2014

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/7/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )
 
1. Vikson Commodities Private Limited
Chd.
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER PRESIDENT
 HON'ABLE MR. DEV RAJ MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

                    UNIONTERRITORY,CHANDIGARH

                                 

First Appeal No.

7 of 2014

Date of Institution

03.01.2014

Date of Decision    

13.01.2014

 

Vikson Commodities Private Limited through its authorized representative i.e. Ms.Daljeet Kaur, having its registered office at SCO No.58-59, Sector 17-D, Chandigarh.

 

                     

Versus

 

1]    Just Dial Private Limited through its Managing Director, Palm Court, Building M, 501/B, 5th Floor, Besides Gurgaon Sports, Club Link Road, Malad (W) Mumbai 400064

 

       2nd       SCO No.60-61, 4th Floor, Sector 34-A, Chandigarh.

 

2]    HDFC Bank Limited through its Managing Director, SCO No.147-148, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh.

                                                           

---Respondents/Opposite Parties.

 

BEFORE:

             

      

Argued by:Sh. P. K. Kukreja, Advocate for the appellant.

 

PER DEV RAJ, MEMBER

             

2.          

3.          took up a preliminary objection, to the effect, that neither the complainant was a consumer nor it was a consumer dispute; that by entering into the contract, the complainant availed of the services of Opposite Party No.1 to promulgate business, generate substantial clientele and earn profits; hence this complaint was not maintainable. On merits, it was admitted that the complainant entered into an agreement, with Opposite Party No.1, for availing of its services.  It was also admitted that the total contractual amount was Rs.16,545/-. It was denied that the contract period was for a period of one year i.e. from 1.4.2010 to 31.3.2011.  It was further stated that the agreement dated 1.4.2010, was active, beyond the initial minimum tenure of 1 year, owing to the fact, that adhering to the terms of the agreement as specified in Clause-A(i) of the “Addendum to the Terms of Service”, Opposite Party No.1 was providing services to the complainant, and payment for the same was being made through ECS.  It was further stated that Opposite Party No.1, received the request of the complainant, to stop the ECS only on 11.8.2012 and by 13.8.2012, the needful was done. It was further stated that the averment of the complainant that the contract was for a limited period of one year was a complete afterthought.  It was further stated that the contract was conditional and it contained an automatic renewal clause, hence the contention of withdrawal of an amount of Rs.20,822/-, in excess of the contractual amount, till July, 2012, was baseless. It was further stated that neither there was any deficiency, in rendering service, on the part of Opposite Party No.1, nor did it indulge into unfair trade practice. The remaining averments, were denied, being wrong.

4.          

5.          

6.          

7.          

8.           

9.           

 

10.        

 

11.        complainant availed of the services of Opposite Party No.1, to promulgate business, generate substantial clientele and earn profits.Even otherwise, the appellant/complainant is a Private Limited Company and the services to be provided viz. recommendations to various clients through web, voice calls, sms etc. were totally commercial in nature.Thus, the appellant/complainant did not fall within the definition of ‘consumer’ as defined in Section 2(1)(d)(ii) of the Act, which is extracted below:-

  

(i)      (ii)      

          

 

12.        

“(A) This Clause (A) applies if you have availed of the Electroinc Clearing Scheme (ECS) introduced by JustDial to enable easy, regular and paperless transfer of monies by way of service charges from you to JustDial.

You will give your bankers clear instructions for debit from your account the amount you have contracted to pay JustDial at such intervals as agreed with JustDial. A copy of the ECS request shall be submitted to us together with the signature of this Addendum.

Notwithstanding anything contained in the Terms of Service or any other contract with JustDial -

(i) If you are an Advertiser applying for any package 

(B)  (C)  

13. 

14.

15.        

16.        

17.        

Pronounced.

January 13, 2014.

                               

Sd/-

[JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER (RETD.)]

PRESIDENT

 

Sd/-

[DEV RAJ]

MEMBER

AD

 

 


 

 

STATE COMMISSION

(First Appeal No.7 of 2014)

Argued by:Sh. P. K. Kukreja, Advocate for the appellant.

 

Dated the 13th

 

ORDER

 

           

 

 

 

(DEV RAJ)

MEMBER

(JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER (RETD.))

PRESIDENT

 

Ad

 

 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'ABLE MR. DEV RAJ]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.