NCDRC

NCDRC

FA/578/2013

SKODA AUTO INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR. - Complainant(s)

Versus

JUPUDY VENKATARAMANA MURTHY & ANR. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. VIPIN SINGHANIA

31 Oct 2014

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
FIRST APPEAL NO. 578 OF 2013
 
(Against the Order dated 12/06/2013 in Complaint No. 34/2012 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)
1. SKODA AUTO INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR.
THROUGH SHRI NAGESH S. SANGLE, MANAGER-LEGAL) A-1/1, FIVE STAR INDUSTRIAL AREA, SHENDRA, MIDC
AURANGABAD
MAHARASHTRA
2. MAHAVIR AUTO
THROUGH SHRI YESHWANTH JHABAKH, DIRECTOR, MAHAVIR AUTO DIAGNOSTICS P. LIMITED, 6-3-907, SOMAJIGUDA,
HYDERABAD-500032
ANDHRA PRADESH
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. JUPUDY VENKATARAMANA MURTHY & ANR.
S/O. LATE JUPUDY JAGANNADHA RAO, 8-6-1/4, NALLAM BHEEMA RAJU VIDHI, T. NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY 533101
BAST GODAVARI DISTRICT,
ANDHRA PRADESH
2. MAHAVIR AUTO
SY. NO. 250/11-NH-5, NEXT TO GOWTHAM COLLEGE, GUDAVALLI, VIJAYWADA-521104
ANDHRA PRADESH
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN, PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. VINAY KUMAR, MEMBER

For the Appellant :
Mr. Vipin Singhania, Advocate
For the Respondent :
Mr. K.K. Kishore, Advocate for R-1

Dated : 31 Oct 2014
ORDER

          Learned counsel appearing for the Appellants, viz. the Manufacturer and the Dealer, submits that the Appellants are willing to refund to Respondent No.1, the Complainant, a sum of Rs.16,87,958/-, as the cost of the vehicle in question towards full and final settlement of the issue involved in this Appeal, subject to the said Respondent withdrawing his allegation of manufacturing defects in the vehicle.  Learned Counsel appearing for the said Respondent is willing to accept the offer.

          In view of the above, with the consent of counsel for the parties, we dispose of the Appeal with a direction that the afore-stated amount shall be paid by the Appellants to Respondent No.1 after accounting for the amount already deposited by the Appellants in this Commission.  The amount deposited in this Commission shall be released to Respondent No.1 forthwith along with the accrued interest, if any, by the office.  The balance amount shall be paid by the Appellants to the said Respondent within four weeks from today, on the said Respondent executing the requisite documents for transfer of the vehicle in the name of the Appellants or any other party, as may by desired by them.  It is agreed by learned counsel for Respondent No.1 that on payment of the said amount, the allegation of manufacturing defect shall stand withdrawn.

          The Appeal stands disposed of in the above terms.

The statutory amount deposited by the Appellants shall stand transferred to the “Consumer Legal Aid Account – NCDRC”.

 
......................J
D.K. JAIN
PRESIDENT
......................
VINAY KUMAR
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.