Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/105/2023

Sri Kailash Jena, aged 51 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

Junior Engineer (Electrical), TPNODL, Mitrapur, Balasore - Opp.Party(s)

Sri Satya Narayan Mallick & associates

17 Sep 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/105/2023
( Date of Filing : 26 Sep 2023 )
 
1. Sri Kailash Jena, aged 51 years
S/o. Sri Baidhar Jena, At/ P.O- Machhua, P.S- Nilagiri, Dist- Balasore- 756020.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Junior Engineer (Electrical), TPNODL, Mitrapur, Balasore
O/o. J.E, Mitrapur, At/ P.O- Mitrapur, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
2. Sub-Divisional Officer (Electrical), TPNODL, Nilagiri
O/o. S.D.O, Nilagiri Sub-Division, Nilagiri, At/ P.O/ P.S- Nilagiri, Dist- Balasore- 756020.
Odisha
3. Chief Executive Officer (Electrical), TPNODL, Balasore
At/ P.O- Januganj, P.S- Industrial Area, Dist- Balasore- 756019.
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 Sri Bikash Mohan Das, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
 Sri Bikash Mohan Das, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
Dated : 17 Sep 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case is posted today for hearing. Advocate for the complainant is absent, no steps filed. Advocate for the O.Ps No.1 & 2 is present and files hazira. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up. Perused the case record.

                                         In the present case, the O.Ps No.1 & 2 were appeared and filed w/v and the case against the O.P No.3 was dismissed. As it appears from the case record that the complainant remained absent since 09.11.2023 to till today and also not received the copy of w/v of O.Ps No.1 & 2, for which hearing of the case impaired and the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, it is presumed that the complainant has no interest to prosecute his own case. Considering the nature & conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.   

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed against the O.Ps is treated to be infructuous.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.