NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/630/2010

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION - Complainant(s)

Versus

JOGINDER LAL & ANR. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. KESHAV MOHAN

11 Mar 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 630 OF 2010
(Against the Order dated 12/11/2008 in Appeal No. 1420/2002 of the State Commission Punjab)
1. EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATIONThrough RPFC, Chandigarh, Sub-Accountant Office, Tanda Road, Near Janta HospitalJalandharPunjab ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. JOGINDER LAL & ANR.R/o. Village Adampur Mohitian, P.O. Dhera, Tehsil MukerianHoshiarpurPunjab2. M/S. THE SIKH NEWSPAPER LTD.(Akali Patrika)Jalandhar CityPunjab ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. S.K. NAIK ,MEMBER
For the Petitioner :MR. KESHAV MOHAN
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 11 Mar 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

This revision petition has been filed with a delay of 329 days, which is over and above the period of 90 days statutorily given to file the revision petition.  Under the C.P.Act, the consumer fora are required to decide the case within a period of 90 days from the date of filing where no evidence is required to be taken and within 150 days, wherever evidence is required to be taken. Delay of 329 days which is almost 11 months over and above the statutorily period given to file the revision petition, cannot be condoned without showing sufficient cause.  As per averments made in the application for condonation of delay, delay has  been caused due to administrative reasons ; that the file was moving from table to table.  We are not satisfied with the cause shown.  The application for condonation of delay is dismissed. Consequently, the revision petition is dismissed as barred by time. 



......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................S.K. NAIKMEMBER