Delhi

North East

CC/121/2023

FIROZ ALI - Complainant(s)

Versus

JITENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL - Opp.Party(s)

19 May 2023

ORDER

   DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION: NORTH-EAST

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

D.C. OFFICE COMPLEX, BUNKAR VIHAR, NAND NAGRI, DELHI-93

 

Complaint Case No.121/23

 

In the matter of:

 

 

Shri Firoz Ali,

S/o Mohd. Barkat Ali,

C/o C-6/138, Yamuna Vihar,

North East Delhi, Delhi-110053

 

 

 

Complainant

 

 

 

Versus

 

 

1.

 

 

 

 

Jitendra Kumar Aggarwal

(Proprietor of M/s R K Trading Company)

C/o B-6, Jhansi Road, Chetakpuri, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh 474009

 

Opaline Cosmetics Private Ltd.,

C/o Plot No. 378, Sec 38, PH-1, HSIIDC,

Industrial Estate Rai, Sonipat,

Haryana 131029

 

Rosila Herbal Private Ltd.,

C/o Survey No. 318/1, Khandelwal Compound, Palda Industrial Area,

Indore-452020

 

Chandgi Ram

(Director of Opaline Cosmetics Pvt. Ltd.)

R/o Bantkhani Kolila, Alwar,

 Rajasthan 301020

 

Ram Mehar Singh

(Director of Opaline Cosmetics Pvt. Ltd.)

R/o 359/11, Adarsh Nagar, Sonipat

Haryana 134003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Opposite Parties

 

 

 

 

           

               DATE OF INSTITUTION:

       JUDGMENT RESERVED ON:

                       DATE OF ORDER  :

03.05.2023

12.05.2023

19.05.2023

 

 

 

CORAM:

Surinder Kumar Sharma, President

Anil Kumar Bamba, Member

Adarsh Nain, Member

 

ORDER

Anil Kumar Bamba, Member

The Complainant has filed the present complaint under Section 35 of the Consumer protection Act, 2019.

Case of the Complainant

  1. The case of the Complainant is that on 16.12.2022, Complainant had purchased a room freshner pack online through Meesho website for an amount of Rs. 435/- for cash payment. After purchasing the Complainant got to know that the manufactured of this product which was in the possession of cosmetics licence vide Mfg. No. 340 COS(H) which is authorized by the FDA (Haryana) to manufacture the cosmetics items is manufacturing the same at Rajasthan without the prior permission and licence of respective FDA(Rajasthan). The same license was already been cancelled in November 2021 while the product carried manufacturing date June 2022.The license is not authorized for Rajasthan but for the factory of Haryana and which had already been cancelled.   The factory and all their business activities in that address i.e. Plot No. 378, Sec 38 PH 1, HSIIDC Industrial Estate Rai, Sonipat, Haryana was already closed by the company in November 2021.
  2. In his complaint, Complainant is raising the issue about the Opposite Parties was not holding valid licence to manufacture the product he had purchased. This Forum is not a proper Forum to examine the manufacturer licence of the Opposite Parties.
  3. Hence, we do not find any merit to admit the complaint and the same is dismissed. 
  4. Order announced on 19.05.2023.

Copy of this order be given to the Complainant free of cost

File be consigned to Record Room.

(Anil Kumar Bamba)

          Member

(Adarsh Nain)

(Member)

(Surinder Kumar Sharma)

President

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.