Kerala

Ernakulam

CC/18/109

K.GIRIDHAR - Complainant(s)

Versus

JIO DIGITAL - Opp.Party(s)

03 Nov 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
ERNAKULAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/18/109
( Date of Filing : 06 Mar 2018 )
 
1. K.GIRIDHAR
KAIRALI APARTMENT H NO.E 21/327/A4 POST TRIPUNITHURA ERNAKULAM
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. JIO DIGITAL
MANAGER JIO DIGITAL EXPRESS MINI AMBILIYIL BUILDING NORTH GATE TRIPUNITHURA COCHIN
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. D.B BINU PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. RAMACHANDRAN .V MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. SREEVIDHIA T.N MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 03 Nov 2022
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION ERNAKULAM

       Dated this the 3rd day of November 2022                                                                                                

                             Filed on: 06/03/2018

PRESENT

Shri.D.B.Binu                                                                          President

Shri.V.Ramachandran                                                              Member

Smt.Sreevidhia.T.N                                                                 Member                                                                  

CC NO. 109/2018

 

Between

COMPLAINANT

K. Giridhar, S/o. Dr. M. Kesavan, Kairali Apartments, House No. “E” No.21/1327/A4, Tripunithura, PIN 682301.

 

 

VS

OPPOSITE PARTIES

Manager & Executive, M/s. JIO DIGITAL EXPRESS MINI, Ambiliyil Building, North Fort Gate, Tripunithura, Cochin 682301

(Rep. by Adv. P.M. Kujumoideenkutty, M/s. Sheriff Associates LLP, 66/3358, Kolliyil Buildings, Near Mullassery Canal, chittoor Road, Kochi 682011)

 

FINAL O R D E R

D.B.Binu, President:

The complaint was filed under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act,1986. The complainant is absent and has no representation from his side and opposite party represented. The case is posted for final hearing. Today also the complainant is absent and has no representation. The complainant is continuously absent.

Notice was sent to the complainant on 05.10.2021 for the appearance of the complainant to adduce evidence from his side. The complainant did not turn up. No reason is there for proceeding with the complaint. The opposite party is strongly stating that they are repeatedly appearing before the Commission.

Hence, taking all the above aspects the complaint is dismissed for default of the complainant.

Pronounced in the open Commission on this the Dated this the 03rd day of November 2022.

 

Sd/-

                                                                             D.B.Binu, President

 

                                                                                         Sd/-

                                                                             V. Ramachandran, Member

 

                                                                                         Sd/-

Sreevidhia.T.N, Member         

 

Forwarded/by Order

 

 

Assistant Registrar

 

 

Despatch date:

By hand:     By post                                                  

kp/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CC No. 109/2018

     Order Date: 03/11/2022                                                                                                 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. D.B BINU]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. RAMACHANDRAN .V]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SREEVIDHIA T.N]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.