Kerala

StateCommission

A/11/224

The Branch manager,South Indian Bank - Complainant(s)

Versus

Jijimon K Thomas - Opp.Party(s)

S.Williams

07 Apr 2011

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. A/11/224
(Arisen out of Order Dated 01/02/2011 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/09/11 of District Kozhikode)
 
1. The Branch manager,South Indian Bank
Thiruvambadi Branch,Calicut
Kozhikode
Kerala
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Jijimon K Thomas
Illikkal House,Thiruvambadi
Kozhikode
Kerala
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

APPEAL NO.224/11

JUDGMENT DATED 7.4.2011

 

PRESENT

 

JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU                --  PRESIDENT

SHRI.S.CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR                    --  MEMBER

 

South Indian Bank,

Thiruvananthapuram Branch,

Calicut reptd. By its                                            --  APPELLANT

Branch Manager.

     (By Adv.S.Williams)         

 

                   Vs.

 

Sri.Jijimon K.Thomas                                         --  RESPONDENT

Illikkal House, Thiruvambadi.P.O,

Thiruvambadi, Via, Calicut.                                                                                         

                                                JUDGMENT

                              

JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU,PRESIDENT

 

          The appellants are the opposite parties in CC.11/09 in the file of CDRF, Kozhikode.  The appellants are under orders to re-deposit the amount withdrawn by the appellant and also to pay compensation of Rs.5000/- and cost of Rs.500/-.

          2. It is the case of the complainant that out of the amount deposited by him ie; Rs.4000/- on 20.4.07  The opposite party deducted Rs.1000/- each on 3 occasions without intimating the complainant.  He has sought for refund of the above amount and also compensation of Rs.25,000/-.

          3. It is the case of the opposite parties that the complainant is having current account in the opposite party/Bank and that he has to maintain a minimum balance of Rs.5000/- failing which a sum of Rs.1000/- will be deducted at each quarter.

          4. The evidence adduced consisted of the testimony of  PW1, RW1 and Exts.A1 to A5 & B1 to B3.

          5. The Forum has allowed the complaint as there was nothing to show that the complainant was intimated as to the present rule of the Bank that the account holder should have a minimum balance of Rs.5000/-.

  6.  We find that there is no illegality in the order of the Forum.  There is no scope for admitting the appeal.  The appeal is dismissed in limine.

The office will forward the copy of this order to the Forum.

 

JUSTICE  K.R.UDAYABHANU --  PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 S.CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR --  MEMBER

 

 

 
 
[HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.