Kerala

StateCommission

RP/10/39

RLIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY - Complainant(s)

Versus

JESSY EMMANUEL PADIPURA - Opp.Party(s)

SREEVARAHAM SATHEESH

24 Nov 2010

ORDER

 
Revision Petition No. RP/10/39
(Arisen out of Order Dated 08/10/2010 in Case No. CC387/10 of District Kottayam)
 
1. RLIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
570,RECTIFIER HOUSE,NAIGAUM CROSS ROAD ,WADALA ,MUMBAI
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA
2. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD
VISHNU BUILDING,KADAVANTHRA,KOCH
ERNAKULAM
KERALA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. JESSY EMMANUEL PADIPURA
PODIPARA HOUSE MUTTAMBALAM P.O
KOTTAYAM
KERALA
2. THE GENERAL MOTORS INDIA LTD,HALOL
VADODRA
VADODRA
GUJARATH
3. THE MANAGER
GEEYEM MOTORS PVT LTD,11/336,BYPASS ROAD,NETTOOR P.O,KOCHI
ERNAKULAM
KERALA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL 

     COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

    REVISION PETITION:39/2010

 

                                  ORDER DATED:24..11..2010

 

 

PRESENT

 

JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU                :  PRESIDENT

 

SHRI.S. CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR                             : MEMBER

 

1.      Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.,

570,  Rectifier house, Naigaum Cross-

Road, Wadala, Mumbai.

                                                                   : PETITIONERS

2.      Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.,

Vishnuu Building, K.P.Vallon road,

Kadavanthra, Cochin.

 

(By Adv: Sreevaraham.G.Satheesh)

 

          Vs.

1.      Jessy Emmanuel Podipara,

Podiapara house,

Muttambalam.PO, Kottayam.

 

2.      The General Motors India Pvt.Ltd.,

Halol, Vadodara, Gujarat.                         : RESPONDENTS

 

3.      The Manager,

Geeyem Motors Pvt. Ltd.,

11/336, NH 47 Bye pass,

Nettor.P.O, Cochin.

 

 

 

 

                                       ORDER

 

JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU:  PRESIDENT

 

The appellants are the opposite parties in I.A.464/2010 in CC.387/09 in the file of CDRF, Kottayam.

2. Revision petition is filed over the order in the I.A allowing the prayer of the complainant for appointing a surveyor to assess the loss and damage caused to the vehicle.  The Forum has allowed the petition and directed both sides to submit a panel.  The contention of the appellants/opposite parties is that there is already a survey report and hence another survey report is not required.  We find that there is no merit in the above contention.  The complainant is at liberty to adduce further evidence if he is not satisfied with the report of the surveyor appointed by the opposite party.  Hence we find that there is no scope for admitting the revision petition.  The revision petition is dismissed in-limine.

Office will forward copy of this order to the Forum.

 

JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU:  PRESIDENT

 

VL.

 

S. CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR : MEMBER

 

 
 
[HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.