Kerala

StateCommission

A/09/706

Hillarious Dress Cleaners - Complainant(s)

Versus

Jayasree.P.V - Opp.Party(s)

Shyam Padman

28 Apr 2010

ORDER

First Appeal No. A/09/706
(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/10/2009 in Case No. CC 210/08 of District Kozhikode)
1. Hillarious Dress CleanersJayanthi Building, Palayam, Calicut
PRESENT :

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

 

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
             VAZHUTHACAUD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM                                                                                               
                                                 APPEAL NO.706/09
                             JUDGMENT DATED 28.4.2010
 
PRESENT
JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU                   -- PRESIDENT
SRI.M.K.ABDULLA SONA                                  -- MEMBER
 
M/S Hillarious Dress Cleaners,
JayanthiBuilding,
Palayam, Calicut 673 001.                                     -- APPELLANT
   (By Adv.Shyam Padman)
 
          Vs.
Jayasree P.V,
W/0 Sree Vallabhan,
Opposite Party No.1,                                             -- RESPONDENT
Swathi, Kottamparamba P.O,
Calicut 673 008.
 
                                      JUDGMENT        
 
JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU,PRESIDENT
 
          The appellants are the opposite parties in CC.210/08 in the file of CDRF, Kozhikode. The appellants are under orders to pay a sum of Rs.1750/- and cost of Rs.1,000/-.
          2. The matter relates to the damage sustained to the Saree  entrusted with   opposite parties Drycleaners. The Forum has noted that the Saree in question was produced before the Forum. It is noted that it is seen a small portion of 50 cm. was found   darned using a piece of cloth from the same saree cut from its bottom side and the place from where this piece was cut was seen hastily patch worked using some ordinary cloth.
          3. The evidence adduced consisted of the testimony of PW1, RW1 and Exts.A1 to A4.
          4. It is the contention of the counsel for the appellant that as per Ext.A1 photocopy of bill issued by appellant the declared value of the saree is only Rs.1750/- and as per the terms printed in the bill it is mentioned that for tear etc. of the dress the only liability is to get it repaired.
          5. We find that the complainant has produced Ext.A2 bill which mentions that price of the saree is Rs.1,750/-. The saree was entrusted  for dry cleaning on 7.3.08. Evidently, the complainant has used the saree for 2 ½ months only. Hence, the conditions mentioned in the bill issued by the appellant cannot be treated as mutually agreed terms. We find that there is no patent illegality in the order of the Forum. There is no scope for admitting the appeal. The appeal is dismissed in limine.
          The office is directed to forward the copy of this order to the Forum urgently.
JUSTICE  K.R.UDAYABHANU        -- PRESIDENT
 
 
 M.K.ABDULLA SONA                    -- MEMBER
PRONOUNCED :
Dated : 28 April 2010

[HONORABLE JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]PRESIDENT[HONORABLE SMT.VALSALA SARNGADHARAN]Member