Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/111/2013

M.R. ARUN , MANAGING TRUSTEE - Complainant(s)

Versus

JAYARAJ KARZ, THE MANAGING PARTNER - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. S. PREMALATHA

25 Oct 2021

ORDER

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

               BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                                        Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

C.C. No.111/2013

                                                                  DATED THE 25^TH  DAY OF OCTOBER  2021

 

Mr. M.R.Arun,

Managing Trustee,

M/s. Pavendar Bharathidasan College of

Engineering and Technology,

Natraj Nagar,Mathur,

Trichy- 620 001.                                                                          .. Complainant.

 

-Versus-

1. The Managing Partner,

    M/s. Jayaraj Karz,

    Authorized Dealer for General Motors India [P] Ltd.,

    T.S. No.152/2, Madurai Main Road,

    Near Krishthuraj College,Panchappur,

    Tiruchirappalli- 620 012.

 

2. The Managing Director,

    M/s. General Motors India [P] Ltd.,

    No 498 Karamuthu Centre Ground Floor,

    Anna Salai, Nandanam,

    Chennai - 600 035 

                                                                                                  .. Opposite Party.

 

 Counsel for the complainant                    : M/s. S. Premalatha

 Counsel for the opposite party 1              : M/s. Paul & Paul

 Counsel for the opposite party 2              : M/s B.L. Lavanya

 

          This consumer complaint coming up before us on 25.10.2021 for hearing. Due to non-representation of the complainant, this Commission made the following order:-

                                            

Docket order

 

            No representation for complainant. opposite parties 1 and 2 present. Today this matter is posted for arguments in list. When this matter was called at 11.00 a.m, there was no representation for complainant, hence the matter was passed over and again called at 1.00 noon, the complainant was again not present.  Complainant was continuously absent. Hence, the complaint is dismissed for default.  No cost.

 

 

                   Sd/-                                                                                                   Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                           R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                                 PRESIDENT