Kerala

Palakkad

CC/212/2013

Subramanyan - Complainant(s)

Versus

Janardanan. M - Opp.Party(s)

01 Jan 2014

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/212/2013
 
1. Subramanyan
S/o. Barathayyar, TVS (Retd.), 7/499, Tharekad, Gramam, Palakkad - 678 001.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Janardanan. M
S/o. Madavan, Sankarankandath House, Devi Nagar, Manali, Palakkad - 678 001.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONARABLE MRS. Seena.H PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Shiny.P.R. MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

 

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM

Palakkad, Kerala

Dated this the 1st day of January 2014


 

PRESENT : SMT. SEENA. H, PRESIDENT Date of filing : 19/12/2013

: SMT. SHINY. P. R, MEMBER


 

CC / 212 / 2013

Subramanyan,

S/o. Barathayyar,

TVS (Retd.), 7/499,

Tharekkad, Gramam,

Palakkad – 678 001. : Complainant

Vs

Janardhanan. M,

S/o. Madhavan,

Sankarankandath House,

Devi Nagar, Manali,

Palakkad – 678 001. : Opposite party


 

O R D E R

By Smt. Seena. H, President

Complaint in brief:-

Complainant for the purpose of renovating his house agreed to sell the demolished materials of the old house to the opposite party for an amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- as per agreement dated 4/12/2011. The materials was delivered to opposite party on payment of an advance amount of Rs. 1,001/-. Thereafter opposite party failed to pay the balance amount within the stipulated period. So far opposite party has paid only Rs. 45,000/-. Hence the complaint. Complainant prays for an order directing the opposite party to pay the balance amount along to Rs. 10,000/- compensation and cost.

Complaint posted for hearing on admission and heard.

Complainant herein has sold demolished building materials to opposite party as per agreement dated 4/12/2011. The grievance is regarding non payment of agreed amount within the stipulated period. As per Section 2(d) of Consumer Protection Act, “Consumer” means any person who buys any goods for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment

and includes any user of such goods other than the person who buys such goods for consideration paid or promised or partly paid or partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment when such use is made with the approval of such person, but does not include a person who obtains such goods for resale or for any commercial purposes or hires or avails of any services for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment and includes any beneficiary of such services for consideration paid or promised, or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payments, when such services are availed of with the approval of the first-mentioned person but does not include a person who avails of such services for any commercial purpose.

We are of the view that complaint herein will not come under the definition of Consumer as per Consumer Protection Act. More over complaint is regarding breach of contract for which remedy lies before Civil Court.

In view of the above circumstances without going in to the merits of the case, we dismiss the complaint. Complainant directed to approach appropriate authority for relief.

Pronounced in the open court on this the 1st day of January 2014.

Sd/-

Smt. Seena. H

President

Sd/-

Smt. Shiny. P. R

Member


 


 

 

 
 
[HONARABLE MRS. Seena.H]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Shiny.P.R.]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.